Similar articles

• Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values.

  Symes RJ, Ursell PG. Symes RJ, et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.050. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011. PMID: 21241912
• Scheimpflug keratometry versus conventional automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery.

  Symes RJ, Say MJ, Ursell PG. Symes RJ, et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.026. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010. PMID: 20610087
• Rapid measurement of corneal diameter in children: validation of a clinic-based digital photographic technique.

  Puvanachandra N, Lyons CJ. Puvanachandra N, et al. J AAPOS. 2009 Jun;13(3):287-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.01.006. J AAPOS. 2009. PMID: 19541269 Clinical Trial.
• Corneal imaging with slit-scanning and Scheimpflug imaging techniques.

  Oliveira CM, Ribeiro C, Franco S. Oliveira CM, et al. Clin Exp Optom. 2011 Jan;94(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00509.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16. Clin Exp Optom. 2011. PMID: 20718786 Review.
• Advances in Preoperative Testing for Cataract Surgery.

  Date RC, Al-Mohtaseb ZN. Date RC, et al. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2017 Summer;57(3):99-114. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000171. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2017. PMID: 28590284 Review. No abstract available.