Correlation analyses of detection thresholds of four different odorants
- PMID: 21858265
- DOI: 10.4193/Rhino10.263
Correlation analyses of detection thresholds of four different odorants
Abstract
The detection threshold task of the Sniffin` Sticks can be conducted using two different odorants - n-butanol or phenylethyl alcohol (PEA). Previous studies show contradictory results regarding the correlation analysis of the two odorants. The current study investigated the relationship between PEA and n-butanol with respect to previous findings and subject population. We compared four different odorants (PEA, n-butanol, isoamyl butyrate, isobutanol) in an olfactory detection threshold task depending on subject population. Test odorants were applied to 73 healthy subjects. The experiment was divided into two sessions performed on two different days. The correlation coefficient between individual thresholds of PEA and n-butanol was not significant when exclusively normosmic subjects were included, but significant when additionally hyposmic, older subjects were studied. Comparable results were found for the analysis of the odorants n-butanol and isoamyl butyrate. Correlation between n-butanol and isobutanol was significant, both for exclusively normosmic, and additionally older, hyposmic subjects. The analyses of all other odorants revealed no significant correlations. Results give explanations for previous contradictory findings regarding investigations of PEA and n-butanol in a detection threshold task, and indicate that a formal validation of the Sniffin` Sticks with PEA as odorant is required.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of two different odorants in an olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin’ Sticks.Rhinology. 2010 Sep;48(3):368-73. doi: 10.4193/Rhino09.212. Rhinology. 2010. PMID: 21038032
-
Comparison between odor thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol and butanol.Chem Senses. 2009 Jul;34(6):523-7. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp029. Chem Senses. 2009. PMID: 19525318
-
Evaluation of smoking on olfactory thresholds of phenyl ethyl alcohol and n-butanol.Physiol Behav. 2012 Sep 10;107(2):177-80. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Physiol Behav. 2012. PMID: 22776624
-
Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1608-1614. doi: 10.1002/lary.29395. Epub 2021 Feb 3. Laryngoscope. 2021. PMID: 33533495
-
The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Feb;51(2):70-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.767908. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013. PMID: 23387344 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a Korean Culture-Friendly Olfactory Function Test and Optimization of a Diagnostic Cutoff Value.Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;13(3):274-284. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2020.00864. Epub 2020 Jul 17. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 32668827 Free PMC article.
-
A network model of affective odor perception.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236468. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32730278 Free PMC article.
-
Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Apr;4(4):298-308. doi: 10.1002/alr.21272. Epub 2014 Jan 21. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014. PMID: 24449655 Free PMC article.
-
Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(25):24787-24797. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2515-z. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018. PMID: 29926329 Free PMC article.
-
SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):11275-11284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711415114. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 29073044 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources