Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete or continuous sounds
- PMID: 21858501
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2837-2
Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete or continuous sounds
Abstract
Understanding how the timing of motor output is coupled to sensory temporal information is largely based on synchronisation of movements through small motion gaps (finger taps) to mostly empty sensory intervals (discrete beats). This study investigated synchronisation of movements between target barriers over larger motion gaps when closing time gaps of intervals were presented as either continuous, dynamic sounds, or discrete beats. Results showed that although synchronisation errors were smaller for discrete sounds, the variability of errors was lower for continuous sounds. Furthermore, finger movement between targets was found to be more sinusoidal when continuous sensory information was presented during intervals compared to discrete. When movements were made over larger amplitudes, synchronisation errors tended to be more positive and movements between barriers more sinusoidal, than for movements over shorter amplitudes. These results show that the temporal control of movement is not independent from the form of the sensory information that specifies time gaps or the magnitude of the movement required for synchronisation.
Similar articles
-
The influence of pacer-movement continuity and pattern matching on auditory-motor synchronisation.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2705-2713. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05625-9. Epub 2019 Aug 16. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 31420687
-
Timekeeping strategies operate independently from spatial and accuracy demands in beat-interception movements.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(3):241-53. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3211-8. Epub 2012 Aug 18. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22903462
-
Timing continuous or discontinuous movements across effectors specified by different pacing modalities and intervals.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;220(3-4):335-47. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3142-4. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22710620
-
Sensori-motor synchronisation variability decreases as the number of metrical levels in the stimulus signal increases.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 23. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014. PMID: 24268879
-
The effect of perceptual-motor continuity compatibility on the temporal control of continuous and discontinuous self-paced rhythmic movements.Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Apr;76:102761. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102761. Epub 2021 Jan 20. Hum Mov Sci. 2021. PMID: 33485154
Cited by
-
The impact of cognitive load on operatic singers' timing performance.Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 22;6:429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00429. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25954218 Free PMC article.
-
Timing and correction of stepping movements with a virtual reality avatar.PLoS One. 2020 Feb 28;15(2):e0229641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229641. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32109252 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the Metronome: Auditory Events and Music May Afford More than Just Interval Durations as Gait Cues in Parkinson's Disease.Front Neurosci. 2016 Jun 14;10:272. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00272. eCollection 2016. Front Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27378841 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The influence of pacer-movement continuity and pattern matching on auditory-motor synchronisation.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2705-2713. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05625-9. Epub 2019 Aug 16. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 31420687
-
Manual asymmetry for temporal and spatial parameters in sensorimotor synchronization.Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1511-1518. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4919-2. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 28251335
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources