Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;17(8):596-602.
doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0028. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Using telehealth to provide diabetes care to patients in rural Montana: findings from the promoting realistic individual self-management program

Elizabeth Ciemins  1 , Patricia Coon, Rory Peck, Barbara Holloway, Sung-Joon Min
Affiliations

Using telehealth to provide diabetes care to patients in rural Montana: findings from the promoting realistic individual self-management program

Elizabeth Ciemins et al. Telemed J E Health. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of telehealth technology to provide a team approach to diabetes care for rural patients and determine its effect on patient outcomes when compared with face-to-face diabetes visits.

Materials and methods: An evaluation of a patient-centered interdisciplinary team approach to diabetes management compared telehealth with face-to-face visits on receipt of recommended preventive guidelines, vascular risk factor control, patient satisfaction, and diabetes self-management at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 years postintervention.

Results: One-year postintervention the receipt of recommended dilated eye exams increased 31% and 43% among telehealth and face-to-face patients, respectively (p=0.28). Control of two or more risk factors increased 37% and 69% (p=0.21). Patient diabetes care satisfaction rates increased 191% and 131% among telehealth and face-to-face patients, respectively (p=0.51). A comparison of telehealth with face-to-face patients resulted in increased self-reported blood glucose monitoring as instructed (97% vs. 89%; p=0.63) and increased dietary adherence (244% vs. 159%; p=0.86), respectively. Receipt of a monofilament foot test showed a significantly greater improvement among face-to-face patients (17% vs. 35%; p=0.01) at 1 year postintervention, but this difference disappeared in years 2 and 3.

Conclusions: Telehealth proved to be an effective mode for the provision of diabetes care to rural patients. Few differences were detected in the delivery of a team approach to diabetes management via telehealth compared with face-to-face visits on receipt of preventive care services, vascular risk factor control, patient satisfaction, and patient self-management. A team approach using telehealth may be a viable strategy for addressing the unique challenges faced by patients living in rural communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Department of Health and Human Resources. National Diabetes Fact Sheet. 2007. www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2007.pdf. [Mar 1;2011 ]. www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2007.pdf
    1. American Diabetes A. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:596–615. - PubMed
    1. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: The AACE s System of Intensive Diabetes Self-Management −2002 Update. Endocr Pract. 2002;8(Suppl. 1):40–82. - PubMed
    1. Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2002;287:2542–2551. - PubMed
    1. Narayan KMV. Boyle JP. Geiss LS. Saaddine JB. Thompson TJ. Impact of recent increase in incidence on future diabetes burden: U.S., 2005–2050. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2114–2116. - PubMed

Publication types