Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Nov;66(11):1023-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Radiation dose of non-enhanced chest CT can be reduced 40% by using iterative reconstruction in image space

X H Hu  1 , X F Ding, R Z Wu, M M Zhang
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Radiation dose of non-enhanced chest CT can be reduced 40% by using iterative reconstruction in image space

X H Hu et al. Clin Radiol. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the image quality and dose reduction capability of non-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) examinations using iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS).

Materials and methods: A CT water phantom was scanned at 120 kV/150 mAs and 100 kV/270 mAs as the reference, and the tube current was decreased in 10% intervals down to 40% of the reference value. Image noise was evaluated and compared between filtered back-projection (FBP) and IRIS reconstructed data. In the patient study, 90 patients underwent non-enhanced chest CT examinations; the patients were randomly assigned into three groups: group A (n=30) standard dose protocol, 120 kV/110 mAs; group B (n=30) low dose, 100 kV/110 mAs; group C (n=30) low dose, 120 kV/67 mAs. All images were reconstructed by FBP and IRIS algorithm using matched kernels of B30 and I30. The objective image noise (OIN), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the aorta and latissimus dorsi were measured. The subjective image quality and noise were scored using a three-point scale by two experienced radiologists. The results of the subjective and objective image assessment were compared between groups B and C (low dose) IRIS and group A (standard dose) FBP.

Results: The phantom study showed comparable image noise between the scans using 60% dose with IRIS and 100% dose with FBP for both 120 and 100 kV. In the patient study, groups A, B, and C had effective dose of 3.81 ± 0.43, 2.40 ± 0.19, and 2.41 ± 0.15 mSv. IRIS significantly improved the OIN, SNR, and CNR compared with FBP for the same patient. The OIN, SNR, and CNR using IRIS in group B and C were improved or comparable to those in group A using FBP. No significant difference was found in subjective image quality and noise between groups B and C using IRIS and group A using FBP.

Conclusion: Compared with FBP, IRIS can maintain or improve image quality on unenhanced chest CT image reconstruction while saving 40% radiation dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types