Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Sep 27;105(7):931-7.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.314. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: experience from the ProtecT study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: experience from the ProtecT study

J W F Catto et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Contemporary screening for prostate cancer frequently identifies small volume, low-grade lesions. Some clinicians have advocated focal prostatic ablation as an alternative to more aggressive interventions to manage these lesions. To identify which patients might benefit from focal ablative techniques, we analysed the surgical specimens of a large sample of population-detected men undergoing radical prostatectomy as part of a randomised clinical trial.

Methods: Surgical specimens from 525 men who underwent prostatectomy within the ProtecT study were analysed to determine tumour volume, location and grade. These findings were compared with information available in the biopsy specimen to examine whether focal therapy could be provided appropriately.

Results: Solitary cancers were found in prostatectomy specimens from 19% (100 out of 525) of men. In addition, 73 out of 425 (17%) men had multiple cancers with a solitary significant tumour focus. Thus, 173 out of 525 (33%) men had tumours potentially suitable for focal therapy. The majority of these were small, well-differentiated lesions that appeared to be pathologically insignificant (38-66%). Criteria used to select patients for focal prostatic ablation underestimated the cancer's significance in 26% (34 out of 130) of men and resulted in overtreatment in more than half. Only 18% (24 out of 130) of men presumed eligible for focal therapy, actually had significant solitary lesions.

Conclusion: Focal therapy appears inappropriate for the majority of men presenting with prostate-specific antigen-detected localised prostate cancer. Unifocal prostate cancers suitable for focal ablation are difficult to identify pre-operatively using biopsy alone. Most lesions meeting criteria for focal ablation were either more aggressive than expected or posed little threat of progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tumour focality in prostate cancer. (A) Flowchart of tumour focality within the samples described within this report. (B) The pathological details of tumours fulfilling the criteria for focal therapy. The thick black line represents the 2% of tumours that are pT3 and Gleason 3+3=6.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Catto JW, Abbod MF, Linkens DA, Larre S, Rosario DJ, Hamdy FC (2009) Neurofuzzy modeling to determine recurrence risk following radical cystectomy for nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Clin Cancer Res 15: 3150–3155 - PubMed
    1. Challacombe BJ, Murphy DG, Zakri R, Cahill DJ (2009) High-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer: initial experience with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int 104: 200–204 - PubMed
    1. Chen ME, Johnston D, Reyes AO, Soto CP, Babaian RJ, Troncoso P (2003) A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume. Am J Surg Pathol 27: 1291–1301 - PubMed
    1. Cheng L, Poulos CK, Pan CX, Jones TD, Daggy JK, Eble JN, Koch MO (2005) Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 174: 898–902 - PubMed
    1. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR (2007) Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol 178: S14–S19 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances