Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 31;2(108):1000108.
doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000108.

Pregnancy and Protection: The Ethics of Limiting a Pregnant Woman's Participation in Clinical Trials

Affiliations

Pregnancy and Protection: The Ethics of Limiting a Pregnant Woman's Participation in Clinical Trials

Lori Allesee et al. J Clin Res Bioeth. .

Abstract

The call for the inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials has received renewed attention recently. This interest springs from articles in various medical journals highlighting the gaps in medical knowledge and the need to improve health care for pregnant women.It is not a simple decision whether to include pregnant women in studies or not. The general thought is that it's too dangerous for the baby if a pregnant woman is participating in a trial, and the absence of research on how medications work in pregnant women leave doctors guessing about how to safely and effectively treat patients through pregnancy.Excluding pregnant women from clinical trials are not automatic, not unethical nor is it arbitrarily determined. The regulatory framework is based on sound ethical and legal reasoning that demonstrates when inclusion in a clinical trial is appropriate or when clear and compelling reasons for exclusion are presented. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: Readers will learn about limitations of research, history of the inclusion and exclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials, reticence for inclusions, as well as regulations designed using reasoned legal and ethical principles, such as: Principle of Autonomy, Informed Consent, and Beneficence and Nonmaleficence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mattison Donald, Zajicek Anne. CSD Grand Rounds: Gaps in Knowledge in Treating Pregnant Women. Gender Medicine. 2006;3:169–182. - PubMed
    1. Baylis Francoise. Pregnant Women Deserve Better. Nature. 2010;465:689–690. - PubMed
    1. Lyerly AD, Little MO, Faden RR. “Pregnancy and Clinical Research. Hastings Cent Rep. 2008:38. - PubMed
    1. Macklin Ruth. The Art of Medicine: Enrolling Pregnant Women in Biomedical Research. The Lancet. 2010;375:632–633. - PubMed
    1. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. 2010 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources