Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Oct 26;29(46):8417-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Broad and potent immune responses to a low dose intradermal HIV-1 DNA boosted with HIV-1 recombinant MVA among healthy adults in Tanzania

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Broad and potent immune responses to a low dose intradermal HIV-1 DNA boosted with HIV-1 recombinant MVA among healthy adults in Tanzania

Muhammad Bakari et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Background: We conducted a phase I/II randomized placebo-controlled trial with the aim of exploring whether priming with a low intradermal dose of a multiclade, multigene HIV-1 DNA vaccine could improve the immunogenicity of the same vaccine given intramuscularly prior to boosting with a heterologous HIV-1 MVA among healthy adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Methods: Sixty HIV-uninfected volunteers were randomized to receive DNA plasmid vaccine 1mg intradermally (id), n=20, or 3.8mg intramuscularly (im), n=20, or placebo, n=20, using a needle-free injection device. DNA plasmids encoding HIV-1 genes gp160 subtype A, B, C; rev B; p17/p24 gag A, B and Rtmut B were given at weeks 0, 4 and 12. Recombinant MVA (10(8)pfu) expressing HIV-1 Env, Gag, Pol of CRF01_AE or placebo was administered im at month 9 and 21.

Results: The vaccines were well tolerated. Two weeks after the third HIV-DNA injection, 22/38 (58%) vaccinees had IFN-γ ELISpot responses to Gag. Two weeks after the first HIV-MVA boost all 35 (100%) vaccinees responded to Gag and 31 (89%) to Env. Two to four weeks after the second HIV-MVA boost, 28/29 (97%) vaccinees had IFN-γ ELISpot responses, 27 (93%) to Gag and 23 (79%) to Env. The id-primed recipients had significantly higher responses to Env than im recipients. Intracellular cytokine staining for Gag-specific IFN-γ/IL-2 production showed both CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell responses. All vaccinees had HIV-specific lymphoproliferative responses. All vaccinees reacted in diagnostic HIV serological tests and 26/29 (90%) had antibodies against gp160 after the second HIV-MVA boost. Furthermore, while all of 29 vaccinee sera were negative for neutralizing antibodies against clade B, C and CRF01_AE pseudoviruses in the TZM-bl neutralization assay, in a PBMC assay, the response rate ranged from 31% to 83% positives, depending upon the clade B or CRF01_AE virus tested.

Conclusions: This vaccine approach is safe and highly immunogenic. Low dose, id HIV-DNA priming elicited higher and broader cell-mediated immune responses to Env after HIV-MVA boost compared to a higher HIV-DNA priming dose given im. Three HIV-DNA priming immunizations followed by two HIV-MVA boosts efficiently induced Env-antibody responses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to the report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Profile of trial participants showing 258 who attended pre-screening sessions, 162 screened to obtain 60 enrolled, 59 who received three HIV-DNA/placebo vaccinations, 50 who received the first HIV-MVA/placebo vaccinations and 42 who received the second HIV-MVA/placebo vaccinations.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HIV-specific interferon-γ ELISpot responses in responders (cut-off SFC was >55 spots/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells and 4 times the background and the baseline value): (a) two weeks after three HIV-DNA injections by id group; (b) two weeks after three HIV-DNA injections by im group; (c) two weeks after the first HIV-MVA boost in the DNA id-primed group and (d) two weeks after the first HIV-MVA boost in the DNA im-primed group; (e) two to four weeks after the second HIV-MVA boost in the DNA id-primed group and (f) two to four weeks after the second HIV-MVA boost in the DNA im-primed group.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Lymphoproliferation (LPA) against AT-2 inactivated HIV-1 antigen measured by the [3H]-thymidine uptake assay (cut-off ≥ 6 SI) in HIVIS03 vaccinees at baseline, two weeks after three HIV-DNA vaccinations, two weeks after the first HIV-MVA boost and two weeks after the second HIV-MVA boost.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation between Gag WR reactivity in IFN-γ ELISpot and HIV CM responses in LPA in 50 HIVIS03 volunteers two weeks after the first HIV-MVA immunization (r2 = 0.414, p < 0.001).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Magnitude of HIV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to Gag assessed by a 4-colour IFN-γ/IL-2 ICS assay four weeks after the second HIV-MVA boost in samples from vaccinees primed with HIV-DNA id or im.

References

    1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. 2010 Available from: www.unaids.org/globalreport/Global_report.htm.
    1. Paris RM, Kim JH, Robb ML, Michael NL. Prime-boost immunization with poxvirus or adenovirus vectors as a strategy to develop a protective vaccine for HIV-1. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010;9(9):1055–69. - PubMed
    1. Gilbert PB, Peterson ML, Follmann D, Hudgens MG, Francis DP, Gurwith M, et al. Correlation between immunologic responses to a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine and incidence of HIV-1 in a phase 3 HIV-1 preventive vaccine trial. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(5):666–77. - PubMed
    1. Phogat S, Wyatt RT, Karlsson Hedestam GB. Inhibition of HIV-1 entry by antibodies: potential viral and cellular targets. J Intern Med. 2007;262(1):26–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson HL, Amara RR. T cell vaccines for microbial infections. Nat Med. 2005;11:S25–32. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms