Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;141(10):1847-54.
doi: 10.3945/jn.111.142257. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

Foods, fortificants, and supplements: Where do Americans get their nutrients?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Foods, fortificants, and supplements: Where do Americans get their nutrients?

Victor L Fulgoni 3rd et al. J Nutr. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Limited data are available on the source of usual nutrient intakes in the United States. This analysis aimed to assess contributions of micronutrients to usual intakes derived from all sources (naturally occurring, fortified and enriched, and dietary supplements) and to compare usual intakes to the Dietary Reference Intake for U.S. residents aged ≥2 y according to NHANES 2003-2006 (n = 16,110). We used the National Cancer Institute method to assess usual intakes of 19 micronutrients by source. Only a small percentage of the population had total usual intakes (from dietary intakes and supplements) below the estimated average requirement (EAR) for the following: vitamin B-6 (8%), folate (8%), zinc (8%), thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B-12, phosphorus, iron, copper, and selenium (<6% for all). However, more of the population had total usual intakes below the EAR for vitamins A, C, D, and E (34, 25, 70, and 60%, respectively), calcium (38%), and magnesium (45%). Only 3 and 35% had total usual intakes of potassium and vitamin K, respectively, greater than the adequate intake. Enrichment and/or fortification largely contributed to intakes of vitamins A, C, and D, thiamin, iron, and folate. Dietary supplements further reduced the percentage of the population consuming less than the EAR for all nutrients. The percentage of the population with total intakes greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) was very low for most nutrients, whereas 10.3 and 8.4% of the population had intakes greater than the UL for niacin and zinc, respectively. Without enrichment and/or fortification and supplementation, many Americans did not achieve the recommended micronutrient intake levels set forth in the Dietary Reference Intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: V. L. Fulgoni III, D. R. Keast, R. L. Bailey, and J. Dwyer, no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage of the population with vitamin (A) and mineral (B) intakes below the EAR for individuals aged ≥2 y (data from NHANES 2003–2006; n = 16,110). Usual intakes from foods (naturally occurring and that from naturally occurring plus added via enrichment and/or fortification) and dietary supplements were estimated by using the National Cancer Institute method with 2 d of reported intake. EAR, estimated average requirement; Vit, vitamin; Ribo, riboflavin.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentage of the population with vitamin (A) and mineral (B) intakes below the EAR for individuals aged 2–18 y (data from NHANES 2003–2006; n = 7250). Usual intakes from foods (naturally occurring and that from naturally occurring plus added via enrichment and/or fortification) and dietary supplements were estimated by using the National Cancer Institute method with 2 d of reported intake. EAR, estimated average requirement; Vit, vitamin; Ribo, riboflavin.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Percentage of the population with vitamin (A) and mineral (B) intakes below the below the EAR for individuals aged ≥19 y (data from NHANES 2003–2006; n = 8860). Usual intakes from foods (naturally occurring and that from naturally occurring plus added via enrichment and/or fortification) and dietary supplements were estimated by using the National Cancer Institute method with 2 d of reported intake. EAR, estimated average requirement; Vit, vitamin; Ribo, riboflavin.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th ed Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion The Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010 [internet]. Alexandria (VA): USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 2010. [cited 28 Oct 2010]. Available from: http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/DGAs2010-DGACReport.htm
    1. Bouchard C. The magnitude of the energy imbalance in obesity is generally underestimated. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32:879–80 - PubMed
    1. Butte NF, Ellis KJ. Comment on obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science. 2003;301:598. - PubMed
    1. Butte NF, Christiansen E, Sorensen TIA. Energy imbalance underlying the development of childhood obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:3056–66 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms