Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;60(6):1152-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.064. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

A stage-for-stage and grade-for-grade analysis of cancer-specific mortality rates in renal cell carcinoma according to age: a competing-risks regression analysis

Affiliations

A stage-for-stage and grade-for-grade analysis of cancer-specific mortality rates in renal cell carcinoma according to age: a competing-risks regression analysis

Maxine Sun et al. Eur Urol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The association of advanced age and cancer control outcomes shows discordant findings.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of age on cancer control outcomes in a large population-based cohort of patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of all stages.

Design, setting, and participants: Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, 36 333 patients with RCC were identified. The population was stratified according to age:<50, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥80 yr. The effect of age on cancer control outcomes was evaluated using competing-risks regression models. Analyses were repeated stage for stage and grade for grade.

Measurements: Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was measured.

Results and limitations: Age categories 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥80 yr respectively portended a 1.4-, 1.5-, 1.6-, and 1.9-fold higher risk of CSM than age category <50 yr (all p < 0.001). The effect of advanced age was particularly detrimental in patients with stage I disease: 1.8-, 2.3-, 3.2-, and 3.8-fold higher CSM risk for the same age groups, respectively (all p<0.001). The effect of age on CSM was at its peak in patients with stage I, low-grade RCC (1.6-, 2.2-, 3.6-, and 4.3-fold, respectively; all p<0.001) and remained elevated in stage I, high-grade RCC (2.2-, 2.6-, 2.4-, and 3.0-fold higher, respectively; all p<0.05). Conversely, its effect was virtually absent in patients with stage II-IV RCC.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that stage I RCC may behave in a more aggressive fashion in elderly patients. Further studies are required to confirm the current findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources