Phonotactic probability of brand names: I'd buy that!
- PMID: 21870135
- PMCID: PMC3289729
- DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0374-z
Phonotactic probability of brand names: I'd buy that!
Abstract
Psycholinguistic research shows that word-characteristics influence the speed and accuracy of various language-related processes. Analogous characteristics of brand names influence the retrieval of product information and the perception of risks associated with that product. In the present experiment we examined how phonotactic probability-the frequency with which phonological segments and sequences of segments appear in a word-might influence consumer behavior. Participants rated brand names that varied in phonotactic probability on the likelihood that they would buy the product. Participants indicated that they were more likely to purchase a product if the brand name was comprised of common segments and sequences of segments rather than less common segments and sequences of segments. This result suggests that word-characteristics may influence higher-level cognitive processes, in addition to language-related processes. Furthermore, the benefits of using objective measures of word characteristics in the design of brand names are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: speech production and word position.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):49-60. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0138). Epub 2008 Aug 22. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 18723600
-
Understanding Bilingual Word Learning: The Role of Phonotactic Probability and Phonological Neighborhood Density.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Dec 20;60(12):3551-3560. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0376. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 29114764
-
Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Aug;53(4):933-49. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0075). Epub 2010 Jun 11. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010. PMID: 20543024 Free PMC article.
-
Using network science in the language sciences and clinic.Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Feb;17(1):13-25. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2014.987819. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015. PMID: 25539473 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The relation between phonetics and phonology.Phonetica. 1991;48(2-4):108-19. doi: 10.1159/000261879. Phonetica. 1991. PMID: 1800994 Review.
Cited by
-
An account of the Speech-to-Song Illusion using Node Structure Theory.PLoS One. 2018 Jun 8;13(6):e0198656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198656. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29883451 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Chat GPT with nonwords and machine psycholinguistic techniques.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325612. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40478818 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cohen JD, MacWhinney B, Flatt M, Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 1993;25:257–271.
-
- Ellis AW, Holmes SJ, Wright RL. Age of acquisition and the recognition of brand names: On the importance of being early. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2010;20:43–52.
-
- Ellis AW, Morrison CM. Real age of acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition. 1998;24:515–523. - PubMed
-
- Gathercole SE, Frankish CR, Pickering SJ, Peaker S. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition. 1999;25:84–95. - PubMed
-
- Hennessey JE, Bell TS, Kwortnik RJ. Lexical interference in semantic processing of simple words: Implications for brand names. Psychology & Marketing. 2005;22:51–69.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources