Author disclosure of conflict of interest in vascular surgery journals
- PMID: 21872118
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.019
Author disclosure of conflict of interest in vascular surgery journals
Abstract
Objectives: Advances in vascular surgery are increasingly technology-driven, and the relationships between surgeons and the medical device industry can be complex. This study reviewed conflict of interest (COI) disclosure in the vascular surgery journals regarding several selected technology-driven topics, including endovascular stent grafts (EV), carotid artery stenting (CAS), and peripheral arterial interventions (PI), to suggest further directions.
Methods: Authors' COI disclosures were reviewed from all clinical papers published in 2008 and 2009 in each of six vascular surgery journals, and pertaining to three selected topics (EV, CAS, and PI). Rate of COI disclosure was evaluated as a function of journal, topic, article type (randomized trial, case series, case report, review, or meta-analysis), and authors' region of origin. Secondarily, consistency of authors' disclosure was evaluated by reviewing papers by the same author and of the same topic.
Results: Six hundred thirty-five papers were reviewed from the six journals. A COI was declared in 125 (19.7%) of these papers. This rate differed between journals (range, 3.2%-34.1%; P < .0001). Rate of disclosure did not differ between topics (range, 12.8%-21.2%; P = .12), article type (range, 14.7%-30%; P = .28), or region of origin (range, 0%-33.3%; P = .09). There were 116 instances of the same author writing papers describing the same general topic. COI disclosure was consistent in the majority of these instances (72.4%), but inconsistent in 32 cases (27.6%). The most common (P = .006) inconsistencies involved the same type of article in different journals (46.9%), or in the same journal (25%).
Conclusions: Rates of disclosure of COI, and inconsistencies in disclosure in the vascular surgery literature are at least partially due to differences in journals' reporting policies, while a smaller proportion of these inconsistencies are due to individual author behavior. Journals should adopt a consistent requirement for a separate COI declaration where all relevant financial arrangements are disclosed.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Requirements and definitions in conflict of interest policies of medical journals.JAMA. 2009 Nov 25;302(20):2230-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1669. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19934424
-
Conflict of interest and disclosure policies in psychiatry and medicine: a comparative study of peer-reviewed journals.Acad Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 1;36(1):17-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.09120248. Acad Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 22362431
-
An analysis of toxicology and medical journal conflict-of-interest polices.Account Res. 2009;16(5):235-53. doi: 10.1080/08989620903190273. Account Res. 2009. PMID: 19757230
-
Conflicts of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Jun;13(6):386-94. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328354a803. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012. PMID: 22551690 Review.
-
Private practice perspective on conflict of interest mandates.J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3 Suppl):15S-8S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.015. J Vasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 21872109 Review.
Cited by
-
Financial conflicts of interest among US physician authors of 2020 clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 23;13(1):e069115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069115. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36690402 Free PMC article.
-
Financial Conflicts of Interest of United States-Based Authors in Neurology Journals: Cross-Sectional Study Using the Open Payments Database.Neurology. 2021 Apr 6;96(14):e1913-e1920. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011701. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Neurology. 2021. PMID: 33632804 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners' confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial.BMC Med. 2014 Apr 28;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-69. BMC Med. 2014. PMID: 24779384 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Conflicts of interest and critiques of the use of systematic reviews in policymaking: an analysis of opinion articles.Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 18;3:122. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-122. Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25417178 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey.BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 10;6(8):e011997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011997. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27515760 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous