Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):366-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.09.004.

Screening for liver metastases in women with mammary carcinoma: comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Screening for liver metastases in women with mammary carcinoma: comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

Martin Mark Hänle et al. Clin Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study was to compare conventional B-mode ultrasound (BMU), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of liver metastases at the primary staging and follow-up of women with histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma.

Patients and methods: Included in the study were 55 women (aged 57.5 ± 11.0 years, range 27-75 years; mean disease duration 57.5 months, range 5-168 months); of these, 17 women were examined as part of primary staging (staging group) and 38 women at follow-up (follow-up group). All patients underwent BMU (Philips HDI 5000), CEUS (Philips HDI 5000; 4.8 ml SonoVue), and MRI (Siemens Avanto 1.5 T) of the liver.

Results: In the staging group (n = 17), a mass was detected by BMU in 24% (n = 4), by CEUS in 29% (n = 5), and by MRI in 47% (n = 8); masses suspicious for malignancy were identified in 6% of patients with BMU and in 12% each by CEUS and MRI. Malignancy was not confirmed in any case by cytology or surgery. In the follow-up group (n = 38), masses were identified by MRI in 53% of patients with suspicion of malignancy in 18%. Malignancy was confirmed in 16% of cases identified at MRI, in 13% of cases identified with CEUS, and in 11% of cases identified with BMU. The Pearson coefficients of correlation were r = .29 (P = .03) for MRI vs. BMU; r = .42 (P = .002) for MRI vs. CEUS; and r = .75 (P ≤ .001) for BMU vs. CEUS. With respect to malignancy, the Pearson coefficients of correlation were r = .40 (P = .099) for BMU vs. MRI and r = .71 (P = .0009) for CEUS vs. MRI.

Conclusions: Beginning in tumor stage III, the use of CEUS and MRI is associated with a significantly greater benefit in the detection of malignant tumors of the liver compared with conventional BMU. BMU appears to be adequate for primary staging and the follow-up of lower tumor stages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources