Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Mar-Jun;15(1):23-33.
doi: 10.1177/1084713811412056. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

A critical review of audiological outcome measures for infants and children

Affiliations
Review

A critical review of audiological outcome measures for infants and children

Marlene P Bagatto et al. Trends Amplif. 2011 Mar-Jun.

Abstract

Outcome evaluation is an important stage in the pediatric hearing aid fitting process, however a systematic way of evaluating outcome in the pediatric audiology population is lacking. This is in part due to the need for an evidence-based outcome evaluation guideline for infants and children with hearing loss who wear hearing aids. As part of the development of a guideline, a critical review of the existing pediatric audiology outcome evaluation tools was conducted. Subjective outcome evaluation tools that measure auditory-related behaviors in children from birth to 6 years of age were critically appraised using a published grading system (Andresen, 2000). Of the tools that exist, 12 were appraised because they met initial criteria outlined by the Network of Pediatric Audiologists of Canada as being appropriate for children birth to 6 years of age who wear hearing aids. Tools that were considered for the guideline scored high in both statistical and feasibility criteria. The subjective outcome evaluation tools that were ultimately chosen to be included in the guideline were the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire (Tsiakpini et al., 2004) and the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) Rating Scale (Ching & Hill, 2005b) due to the high grades they received in the critical review and their target age ranges. Following this critical review of pediatric outcome evaluation tools, the next step was for the Network Clinicians to evaluate the guideline (Moodie et al., 2011b).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. American Academy of Audiology. (2003). American Academy of Audiology pediatric amplification guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/pedamp.pdf
    1. Andresen E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81, Suppl. 2, S15-S20 - PubMed
    1. Anderson K. L. (2000). Early listening function. Retrieved from http://www.kandersonaudconsulting.com/uploads/ELF_Questionnaire.pdf
    1. Anderson K. L., Smaldino J. J. (2000). Children’s home inventory of listening difficulties. Retrieved from: http://www.kandersonaudconsulting.com/uploads/child_questionnaire.pdf
    1. Bagatto M. P., Moodie S. T., Malandrino A. C., Richert F. M., Clench D. A., Scollie S. D. (2011). The University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol (UWO PedAMP), Trends in Amplification, 15(1-2) - PMC - PubMed

Publication types