Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;19(1):63-67.
doi: 10.1177/0963721409359281.

Goal-Driven Cognition and Functional Behavior: The Fundamental-Motives Framework

Affiliations

Goal-Driven Cognition and Functional Behavior: The Fundamental-Motives Framework

Douglas T Kenrick et al. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Fundamental motives have direct implications for evolutionary fitness and orchestrate attention, memory, and social inference in functionally specific ways. Motivational states linked to self-protection and mating offer illustrative examples. When self-protective motives are aroused, people show enhanced attention to, and memory for, angry male strangers; they also perceive out-group members as especially dangerous. In contrast, when mating motives are aroused, men show enhanced attention to and memory for attractive members of the opposite sex; mating motives also lead men (but not women) to perceive sexual arousal in attractive members of the opposite sex. There are further functionally specific consequences for social behavior. For example, self-protective motives increase conformity among both men and women, whereas mating motives lead men (but not women) to engage in anticonformist behavior. Other motivational systems trigger different adaptive patterns of cognitive and behavioral responses. This body of research illustrates the highly specific consequences of fitness-relevant motivational states for cognition and behavior, and highlights the value of studying human motivation and cognition within an evolutionary framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
In-group bias on threat-relevant and threat-irrelevant traits, as a function of self-protective concerns triggered by ambient darkness. Canadians in a darkened room were especially likely to evaluate Iraqis less favorably than they evaluated fellow Canadians. This effect was specific to prejudicial perceptions on traits highly relevant to safety threats (“hostile,” “trustworthy”) but not to perceptions of equally evaluative but threat-irrelevant traits (“ignorant,” “open-minded”). Results based on Schaller et al. (2003).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conformity as a function of activated motive. Both men and women are more conforming when self-protection motives are active (compared to a control condition). In contrast, activating mating motives leads men to become less conforming and, as discussed in the text, more creative and showy in other ways (results based on Griskevicius, Goldstein, Mortensen, Cialdini, & Kenrick, 2006).

References

    1. Ackerman JM, Kenrick DT. The costs of benefits: Help-refusals highlight key trade-offs of social life. Personality & Social Psychology Review. 2008;12:118–140. - PubMed
    1. Ackerman J, Shapiro JR, Neuberg SL, Kenrick DT, Schaller M, Becker DV, et al. They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science. 2006;17:836–840. - PubMed
    1. Becker DV, Kenrick DT, Guerin S, Maner JM. Concentrating on beauty: Sexual selection and sociospatial memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005;12:1643–1652. - PubMed
    1. Becker DV, Kenrick DT, Neuberg SL, Blackwell KC, Smith DM. The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:179–190. - PubMed
    1. Duncan LA, Park JH, Faulkner J, Schaller M, Neuberg SL, Kenrick DT. Adaptive allocation of attention: Effects of sex and sociosexuality on visual attention to attractive opposite-sex faces. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2007;28:359–364. - PMC - PubMed

Recommended Reading

    1. Kenrick DT, Delton AW, Robertson T, Becker DV, Neuberg SL. How the mind warps: A social evolutionary perspective on cognitive processing disjunctions. In: Forgas JP, Haselton MG, Hippel W, editors. The Evolution of the Social Mind: Evolution and Social Cognition. Psychology Press; New York: 2007. pp. 49–68. A chapter reviewing findings indicating that different motivational states produce theoretically meaningful discrepancies between attention, encoding, and memory.

    1. Kenrick, D.T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S.L., & Schaller, M. (in press). (See References.) An article revisiting Abraham Maslow’s famous “pyramid of needs” approach to human motivation and presenting an updated hierarchy of fundamental human motives.

    1. Maner JK, DeWall CN, Baumeister RF, Schaller M. Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the ‘porcupine problem.’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:42–55. An article describing how the arousal of an affiliation motive has functionally specific consequences for social perception and social behavior.

    1. Tooby J, Cosmides L. Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In: Buss DM, editor. Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2005. pp. 5–67. A chapter providing an excellent overview of the assumptions underlying an evolutionary approach to human motivation and cognition.

LinkOut - more resources