A single-centre chart review exploring the adjusted association between breast cancer phenotype and prognosis
- PMID: 21874118
- PMCID: PMC3149547
- DOI: 10.3747/co.v18i4.815
A single-centre chart review exploring the adjusted association between breast cancer phenotype and prognosis
Abstract
Purpose and methods: Using a retrospective chart review, we investigated the differences in survival and prognostic factors between patients with triple-negative breast cancer (tnbc) and those with non-tnbc. The review included 1018 breast cancer patients who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2005 in Essex, Kent, and Lambton counties in Ontario, Canada.
Results: Our findings indicate that, although the unadjusted results suggested that patients with tnbc were more likely than patients with non-tnbc to die [hazard ratio (hr): 2.29; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.33 to 2.93], an adjusted survival analysis revealed no significant difference in overall survival between the groups (hr: 1.22; 95% ci: 0.63 to 2.39). The significant predictors of survival in the adjusted analysis were age, stage of cancer, and size of cancer.
Conclusions: Our findings support those of earlier reports, which suggest that presenting tumour size is the most important prognostic factor in tnbc. Investigations into unique screening methods to identify these tumours at an earlier stage and to prevent advanced-stage cancer in this patient subpopulation are necessary.
Keywords: Triple-negative breast cancer; age; cancer-related death; survival; tumour size.
Conflict of interest statement
The present study was an unsponsored and unfunded research project.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Active behavior of triple-negative breast cancer with adipose tissue invasion: a single center and retrospective review.BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08147-2. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33879104 Free PMC article.
-
Nottingham Prognostic Index in triple-negative breast cancer: a reliable prognostic tool?BMC Cancer. 2011 Jul 15;11:299. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-299. BMC Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21762477 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6668-z. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32131780 Free PMC article.
-
Breast-conserving therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):252-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3037. JAMA Surg. 2014. PMID: 24382582
-
Prognostic Significance of Androgen Receptor Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(4):e385-e396. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 18. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32139270
Cited by
-
Healthcare costs associated with breast cancer in Germany: a claims data analysis.Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Apr;21(3):451-464. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01148-w. Epub 2020 Jan 2. Eur J Health Econ. 2020. PMID: 31897812
-
Her2-neu score as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;142(6):1369-76. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2146-z. Epub 2016 Mar 23. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27008006 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of pattern, time and risk factors influencing recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients.Med Oncol. 2013 Mar;30(1):388. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0388-4. Epub 2013 Jan 5. Med Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23292831 Free PMC article.
-
Triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer: implications for oncologists.Curr Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(4):161-4. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i4.824. Curr Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21874112 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Clinical Significance of Tumor Grade in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Biomedicines. 2025 May 1;13(5):1100. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051100. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40426927 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources