Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Dec;26(12):1779-86.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06891.x.

Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Sebastian Schmidt  1 , Markus Follmann, Nisar Malek, Michael P Manns, Tim F Greten
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Sebastian Schmidt et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background and aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common reason for cancer-related death worldwide. Many countries either lack appropriate clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC or the quality of their guidelines has never been evaluated. The main objective of our work was to identify published HCC guidelines and assess their quality with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument (AGREE) and their suitability regarding adaptation for future guidelines.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on HCC clinical practice guidelines of MEDLINE, National Guidelines Clearinghouse and the Guidelines International Network. Methodological quality of selected guidelines was assessed by the AGREE instrument, Version 2001.

Results: A total of 286 citations were screened and 32 relevant guidelines were identified. Overall, the guidelines performed well in the clarity and presentation domain with a mean score of 67%, followed by scope and purpose (55%) and rigor of development (50%). In contrast, poor scores were given for the remaining domains: stakeholder involvement (23%), applicability (28%) and editorial independence (31%). According to the AGREE instrument, four guidelines can be strongly recommended, 18 with provisos and alterations while the remaining cannot be recommended for adaptation due to poor methodological quality.

Conclusion: Although existing HCC guidelines may accurately reflect agreed clinical practice, many guidelines lack proper methodological quality. Future guidelines should place more emphasis on these methodological shortcomings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Searching and selecting guidelines flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer 2010; 127: 2893–917. - PubMed
    1. Lang K, Danchenko N, Gondek K, Shah S, Thompson D. The burden of illness associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. J. Hepatol 2009; 50: 89–99. - PubMed
    1. Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for A New Program. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1990. - PubMed
    1. Smith TJ, Hillner BE. Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways. J. Clin. Oncol 2001; 19: 2886–97. - PubMed
    1. Nast A, Spuls PH, Ormerod AD et al.A critical appraisal of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris: “AGREE-ing” on a common base for European evidence-based psoriasis treatment guidelines. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol 2009; 23: 782–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms