Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;38(5):542-52.
doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.542-552.

Factors and outcomes of decision making for cancer clinical trial participation

Affiliations

Factors and outcomes of decision making for cancer clinical trial participation

Barbara A Biedrzycki. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: To describe factors and outcomes related to the decision-making process regarding participation in a cancer clinical trial.

Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive.

Setting: Urban, academic, National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in the mid-Atlantic United States.

Sample: 197 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods: Mailed survey using one investigator-developed instrument, eight instruments used in published research, and a medical record review.

Independent variables: disease context, sociodemographics, hope, quality of life, trust in healthcare system, trust in health professional, preference for research decision control, understanding risks, and information.

Dependent variables: decision to accept or decline research participation and satisfaction with this decision.

Findings: All of the factors within the Research Decision Making Model together predicted cancer clinical trial participation and satisfaction with this decision. The most frequently preferred decision-making style for research participation was shared (collaborative) (83%).

Conclusions: Multiple factors affect decision making for cancer clinical trial participation and satisfaction with this decision. Shared decision making previously was an unrecognized factor and requires further investigation.

Implications for nursing: Enhancing the process of research decision making may facilitate an increase in cancer clinical trial enrollment rates. Oncology nurses have unique opportunities as educators and researchers to support shared decision making by those who prefer this method for deciding whether to accept or decline cancer clinical trial participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types