Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;20(10):2127-31.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0437. Epub 2011 Aug 29.

Cancer fatalism: deterring early presentation and increasing social inequalities?

Affiliations

Cancer fatalism: deterring early presentation and increasing social inequalities?

Rebecca J Beeken et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Fatalistic beliefs about cancer have been implicated in low uptake of screening and delay in presentation particularly in low socioeconomic status (SES) groups, but no studies have systematically evaluated interrelationships between SES, fatalism, and early detection behaviors. We explored whether (i) fatalism is associated with negative attitudes toward early detection, (ii) lower SES groups are more fatalistic, and (iii) SES differences in fatalism partly explain SES differences in attitudes toward early detection.

Methods: In a population-representative sample of adults in Britain using computer-based interviews in the home setting, respondents (N = 2,018) answered two questions to index fatalism (expectations of cancer survival and cure) and two items on early detection attitudes (the perceived value of early detection and fear of symptom reporting). SES was indexed with a social grade classification.

Results: Fatalism was associated with being less positive about early detection (β = -0.40, P < 0.001) and more fearful about seeking help for a suspicious symptom (β = 0.24, P < 0.001). Lower SES groups were more fatalistic (β = -0.21, P < 0.001). Path analyses suggest that SES differences in fatalism might explain SES differences in attitudes about early detection.

Conclusions: In this population sample, SES differences in fatalism partly explained SES differences in the perceived value of early detection and fear of symptom presentation.

Impact: Fatalistic beliefs about cancer should be targeted to promote early presentation of cancer and this may be particularly important for lower SES groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Path model for the relationship between SES, fatalism and fear of reporting symptoms/perceived value of early detection. Standardised coefficients reported. Residuals were estimated but are not included in the diagram for ease of reading, ***=p<.001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Straughan PT, Seow A. Fatalism reconceptualized: a concept to predict health screening behavior. J Gender Cult Health. 1998;3(2):85–100.
    1. Niederdeppe J, Levy AG. Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(5):998–1003. - PubMed
    1. von Wagner C, Good A, Whitaker KL, Wardle J. Psychosocial predictors of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: A conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev. 2011 - PubMed
    1. Chavez LR, Hubbell FA, Mishra SI, Valdez RB. The influence of fatalism on self-reported use of Papanicolaou smears. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13(6):418–24. - PubMed
    1. Michielutte R, Dignan MB, Sharp PC, Boxley J, Wells HB. Skin cancer prevention and early detection practices in a sample of rural women. Prev Med. 1996;25(6):673–83. - PubMed