To know or not to know: influence of explicit advance knowledge of occlusion on interceptive actions
- PMID: 21877101
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2846-1
To know or not to know: influence of explicit advance knowledge of occlusion on interceptive actions
Abstract
This study examined how explicit advance knowledge might influence adaptive behavior to visual occlusions. Catching performance and kinematics of good ball catchers were compared between no, early and late occlusion trials. Discrete visual occlusions of 400 ms, occurring early or late in the ball's approach trajectory, were randomly interspersed between no occlusion trials. In one condition, the presence and type of occlusion were announced a priori (expected), whereas in another condition no such information was provided (unexpected). Expectation of occlusion resulted in an adapted limb transport and increased grasping time, whereas in the unexpected condition a higher peak of wrist velocity was evident for all occlusion conditions. The observed different adaptations cannot be explained by trial-by-trial adaptations alone and instead provide evidence for the influence of explicit advance knowledge in the motor response of interceptive actions.
Similar articles
-
Temporal and spatial occlusion of advanced visual information constrains movement (re)organization in one-handed catching behaviors.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Mar;174:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 11. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017. PMID: 28196753
-
(De)synchronization of advanced visual information and ball flight characteristics constrains emergent information-movement couplings during one-handed catching.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Feb;233(2):449-58. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4126-3. Epub 2014 Nov 2. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25362517
-
Influence of cognitive-motor expertise on brain dynamics of anticipatory-based outcome processing.Psychophysiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):e13477. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13477. Epub 2019 Oct 23. Psychophysiology. 2020. PMID: 31642529
-
Grasping in One-Handed Catching in Relation to Performance.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158606. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27392041 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Visual factors in hitting and catching.J Sports Sci. 1997 Dec;15(6):533-58. doi: 10.1080/026404197366985. J Sports Sci. 1997. PMID: 9486432 Review.
Cited by
-
Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Apr;233(4):1097-107. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4191-7. Epub 2015 Jan 8. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25567091
-
Intercepting a moving target: On-line or model-based control?J Vis. 2017 May 1;17(5):12. doi: 10.1167/17.5.12. J Vis. 2017. PMID: 28538992 Free PMC article.
-
Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049381. Epub 2012 Nov 14. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23166653 Free PMC article.
-
On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):190-202. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 20. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25454700 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emergent perception-action couplings regulate postural adjustments during performance of externally-timed dynamic interceptive actions.Psychol Res. 2015 Sep;79(5):829-43. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0613-1. Epub 2014 Sep 27. Psychol Res. 2015. PMID: 25260389
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources