Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug 30:12:92.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-92.

Elective surgical referral guidelines--background educational material or essential shared decision making tool? A survey of GPs' in England

Naomi Blundell  1 , Sian Taylor-Phillips, David Spitzer, Steven Martin, Ian Forde, Aileen Clarke
Affiliations

Elective surgical referral guidelines--background educational material or essential shared decision making tool? A survey of GPs' in England

Naomi Blundell et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: To investigate general practitioners' (GPs') attitudes to guidelines for elective surgical referral in England. To understand their use of guidelines, and attitudes to shared decision making in the referral decision.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed which investigated attitudes to and use of guidelines. It was given to a stratified random sample 30% (n = 310) drawn from GP lists of 10 English health districts (primary care trusts (PCTs)). GPs were invited to respond online, by telephone, fax or post. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and backwards stepwise logistic regression.

Results: Responses were representative of GPs in England, but (despite up to 6 contacts per non-responder) the overall response rate was 41.6% (n = 129; with the range across PCTs of 25-61%). Most responding GPs indicated support for referral guidelines but 18% reported that they had never used them. Less than three per cent reported use for most or all referral decisions. The odds of using guidelines decreased with increasing age, with a ten year increase in age associated with halving odds of use (OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.29-0.90). Over 50% of GPs wanted good access to electronic guidelines with expert information and advice on guideline availability. Almost all (>89%) GPs agreed with sharing referral decisions with patients. Female doctors (OR = 5.2, 95%CI: 1.02-26.3) were more likely to agree with this than male GPs as were those working in larger compared to small or single handed practices (OR = 5.3, 95%CI: 1.4-19.9).

Conclusions: This group of responding GPs was supportive of guidelines but used them in different ways. Referral guidelines should have an educational component for background reading; include key messages for internalisation and application; and incorporate mechanisms to facilitate accessibility and appropriate shared decision making with patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coulter A. The Autonomous Patient: Ending Paternalism in Medical Care. Vol. 128. London: Stationery Office (for the Nuffield Trust); 2002. pp. ISBN 0–11. 703056-2.
    1. Rosen R, Florin D, Dixon J. Context Report. London; King's Fund; 2001. Access to Health Care.
    1. Gulliford M, Hughes D, Figeroa-Munoz J, Access to Health Care - A Scoping Exercise. King's College, London. NCCSDO. LSHTM; 2001.
    1. Boivin A, Légaré F, Gagnon MP. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):79–84. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Squires D, Peugh J, Applebaum S. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(6):w1171–83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1171. Epub 2009 Nov 2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources