Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Feb;470(2):525-34.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2050-4.

Which factors influence preservation of the osteonecrotic femoral head?

Affiliations
Review

Which factors influence preservation of the osteonecrotic femoral head?

Jay R Lieberman et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Although surgeons use many procedures to preserve the femoral head in patients with hip osteonecrosis, there is no consensus regarding the best procedure.

Questions/purposes: We raised the following questions: (1) Is one surgical treatment preferred based on published data? (2) What are the rates of radiographic progression or conversion to THA after treatment of pre- and postcollapse hips? (3) Does lesion size in the femoral head influence progression? And (4) does the extent of involvement of the weightbearing surface of the femoral head influence outcome?

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Scopus for articles published between 1998 and 2010. We included only articles assessing an operative intervention for hip osteonecrosis and having a level of evidence of I to IV. We included 54 of the 488 reviewed manuscripts.

Results: No procedure was superior to others. In pre- and postcollapse hips, 264 of 864 hips (31%) and 419 of 850 hips (49%), respectively, exhibited radiographic disease progression. There were lower failure rates when the lesion involved less than 15% of the femoral head or had a necrotic angle of less than 200° (14%-25%) and when the osteonecrotic lesion involved only the medial 1/3 of the weightbearing surface (4.6%).

Conclusions: The best treatment of precollapse lesions is difficult to determine due to the limitations of the available literature. However, the data suggest operative intervention prevents collapse of small lesions of the femoral head or when there is a limited amount of the weightbearing surface involved. Patients with head collapse have a high progression rate after a femoral head-saving procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A flowchart demonstrates the results of our search of the PubMed and Scopus databases. It lists the number of articles initially identified, followed by a list of those excluded by a review of their abstract and a rationale for exclusion. Furthermore, it illustrates which articles were reviewed more thoroughly and those articles that were then excluded or included in the final manuscript on the basis of that analysis. ONFH = osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aigner N, Schneider W, Eberl V, Knahr K. Core decompression in early stages of femoral head osteonecrosis—an MRI-controlled study. Int Orthop. 2002;26:31–35. doi: 10.1007/s00264-001-0311-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atsumi T, Kajiwara T, Hiranuma Y, Tamaoki S, Asakura Y. Posterior rotational osteotomy for nontraumatic osteonecrosis with extensive collapsed lesions in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 3):42–47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00767. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babhulkar S. Osteonecrosis of femoral head: treatment by core decompression and vascular pedicle grafting. Indian J Orthop. 2009;43:27–35. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.45320. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baksi DP, Pal AK, Baksi DD. Long-term results of decompression and muscle-pedicle bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Int Orthop. 2009;33:41–47. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0455-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berend KR, Gunneson EE, Urbaniak JR. Free vascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of postcollapse osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:987–993. - PubMed