Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Oct;21(5):641-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 29.

Mass spectrometry: come of age for structural and dynamical biology

Affiliations
Review

Mass spectrometry: come of age for structural and dynamical biology

Justin L P Benesch et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Over the past two decades, mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a bone fide approach for structural biology. MS can inform on all levels of protein organization, and enables quantitative assessments of their intrinsic dynamics. The key advantages of MS are that it is a sensitive, high-resolution separation technique with wide applicability, and thereby allows the interrogation of transient protein assemblies in the context of complex mixtures. Here we describe how molecular-level information is derived from MS experiments, and how it can be combined with spatial and dynamical restraints obtained from other structural biology approaches to allow hybrid studies of protein architecture and movements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structure and dynamics space accessible to MS-based approaches
Proteins undergo a range of dynamical fluctuations, from folding of the polypeptide to changes in the composition of the proteome (indicated upper left). These processes span not only a wide range of timescales, but also all aspects of protein organisation, from primary to quinary (clockwise around wheel). A plethora of MS-based approaches can inform on many of these structural dynamics, and are indicated as overlapping coloured wedges, with their tractability in the temporal dimension indicated by shading and the radial scale bar (faster towards centre of wheel). These include ‘bottom-up’ experiments in which peptides, produced by proteolysis of cell extracts or purified components, are interrogated; and ‘top-down’ methodologies which rely on the examination of the proteins or assemblies intact in the gas-phase. Here we have grouped them according to their approximate feasibility as a function of mass (blue = easier as mass increases, orange = more difficult as mass increases, purple = independent of mass).
Chart 1
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 2
Chart 3
Chart 3

References

    1. Robinson CV, Sali A, Baumeister W. The molecular sociology of the cell. Nature. 2007;450:973–982. - PubMed
    1. Russel D, Lasker K, Phillips J, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Velazquez-Muriel JA, Sali A. The structural dynamics of macromolecular processes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:97–108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nilsson T, Mann M, Aebersold R, Yates JR, 3rd, Bairoch A, Bergeron JJ. Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nat Methods. 2010;7:681–685. - PubMed
    1. Heck AJ. Native mass spectrometry: a bridge between interactomics and structural biology. Nat Methods. 2008;5:927–933. - PubMed
    1. Loo JA. Studying noncovalent protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 1997;16:1–23. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources