Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug 31;31(35):12604-12.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1868-11.2011.

Neural basis of adaptive response time adjustment during saccade countermanding

Affiliations

Neural basis of adaptive response time adjustment during saccade countermanding

Pierre Pouget et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

Humans and macaque monkeys adjust their response time adaptively in stop-signal (countermanding) tasks, responding slower after stop-signal trials than after control trials with no stop signal. We investigated the neural mechanism underlying this adaptive response time adjustment in macaque monkeys performing a saccade countermanding task. Earlier research showed that movements are initiated when the random accumulation of presaccadic movement-related activity reaches a fixed threshold. We found that a systematic delay in response time after stop-signal trials was accomplished not through a change of threshold, baseline, or accumulation rate, but instead through a change in the time when activity first began to accumulate. The neurons underlying movement initiation have been identified with stochastic accumulator models of response time performance. Therefore, this new result provides surprising new insights into the neural instantiation of stochastic accumulator models and the mechanisms through which executive control can be exerted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Saccade stop-signal (countermanding) task. Dotted circles indicates gaze position, and the arrow indicates the direction of the saccade. All trials began with the presentation of a central fixation spot. After a variable fixation interval, the fixation spot disappeared and, simultaneously, a target appeared at an eccentric location to the right or left of central fixation. On ∼30% of trials (stop-signal trials), the fixation spot was reilluminated after an interval (stop-signal delay) after target onset. Fixation reillumination was the cue for the monkeys to withhold a saccade to the target. Trials in which monkeys were successful in maintaining fixation were referred to as canceled trials, and trials in which monkeys made a saccade to the eccentric target were referred to as noncanceled trials. For the remaining ∼70% of trials (no-stop-signal trials), the fixation point was not reilluminated and monkeys were reinforced for making a saccade to the peripheral target.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Vincentized response time distributions for no-stop-signal trials preceded by either a no-stop-signal trial (black line) or a canceled trial (gray line) for data collected in sessions during which movement cells were recorded in FEF (a) and SC (b).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time course of activity of representative movement neuron in FEF (top) and in SC (bottom) aligned on target presentation (left) and saccade initiation (right) for no-stop-signal trials preceded by either no-stop-signal (black) (FEF n = 34, SC n = 371) or canceled stop-signal (gray) (FEF n = 9, SC n = 73) trials. The onset (vertical arrow) and average RT (vertical line) are indicated for both neurons for both trial sequences.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Time course of grand average of activity of FEF (top) and SC (bottom) neurons aligned on target presentation (left) and saccade initiation (right) for no-stop-signal trials preceded by either no-stop-signal (black) or canceled stop signal (gray). The discharge rates were normalized to the trigger thresholds of individual neurons. Average onset times indicated by the vertical lines. Note the common thresholds and rates of accumulation, especially in the plots aligned on saccade initiation. Also note the continuously earlier accumulation in NS-NS as compared to C-NS trials.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
a–d, Stacked bar plots of the differences in the threshold activity level (ΔT) (a), baseline activity level (ΔB) (b), rate of growth (Δr) (c), and time of onset of accumulation (Δo) (d) for FEF (filled) and SC (open) between no-stop-signal trials preceded by either a no-stop-signal trial or a canceled trial. Insets diagram the alternative mechanisms of RT change for no-stop-signal trials preceded by either a no-stop-signal trial (black) or a canceled trial (gray). Only the difference in time of onset of accumulation accounted for the RT difference (ΔRT).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Visual responses in FEF (top) and SC (bottom) for representative neurons (left) and average (right) for no-stop-signal trials preceded by either no-stop-signal (black) or canceled (gray) trials. Average RT (vertical line) in the two trial sequences is indicated for the individual neurons.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bichot NP, Thompson KG, Chenchal Rao S, Schall JD. Reliability of macaque frontal eye field neurons signaling saccade targets during visual search. J Neurosci. 2001;21:713–725. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bogacz R, Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P, Cohen JD. The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol Rev. 2006;113:700–765. - PubMed
    1. Boucher L, Palmeri TJ, Logan GD, Schall JD. Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychol Rev. 2007;114:376–397. - PubMed
    1. Brown JW, Hanes DP, Schall JD, Stuphorn V. Relation of frontal eye field activity to saccade initiation during a countermanding task. Exp Brain Res. 2008;190:135–151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown SD, Heathcote A. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn Psychol. 2008;57:153–178. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources