Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Sep 1:343:d5326.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5326.

Effect of manual lymph drainage in addition to guidelines and exercise therapy on arm lymphoedema related to breast cancer: randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of manual lymph drainage in addition to guidelines and exercise therapy on arm lymphoedema related to breast cancer: randomised controlled trial

Nele Devoogdt et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the preventive effect of manual lymph drainage on the development of lymphoedema related to breast cancer.

Design: Randomised single blinded controlled trial.

Setting: University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Participants: 160 consecutive patients with breast cancer and unilateral axillary lymph node dissection. The randomisation was stratified for body mass index (BMI) and axillary irradiation and treatment allocation was concealed. Randomisation was done independently from recruitment and treatment. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups.

Intervention: For six months the intervention group (n = 79) performed a treatment programme consisting of guidelines about the prevention of lymphoedema, exercise therapy, and manual lymph drainage. The control group (n = 81) performed the same programme without manual lymph drainage.

Main outcome measures: Cumulative incidence of arm lymphoedema and time to develop arm lymphoedema, defined as an increase in arm volume of 200 mL or more in the value before surgery.

Results: Four patients in the intervention group and two in the control group were lost to follow-up. At 12 months after surgery, the cumulative incidence rate for arm lymphoedema was comparable between the intervention group (24%) and control group (19%) (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 2.9; P = 0.45). The time to develop arm lymphoedema was comparable between the two group during the first year after surgery (hazard ratio 1.3, 0.6 to 2.5; P = 0.49). The sample size calculation was based on a presumed odds ratio of 0.3, which is not included in the 95% confidence interval. This odds ratio was calculated as (presumed cumulative incidence of lymphoedema in intervention group/presumed cumulative incidence of no lymphoedema in intervention group)×(presumed cumulative incidence of no lymphoedema in control group/presumed cumulative incidence of lymphoedema in control group) or (10/90)×(70/30).

Conclusion: Manual lymph drainage in addition to guidelines and exercise therapy after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer is unlikely to have a medium to large effect in reducing the incidence of arm lymphoedema in the short term. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register No NTR 1055.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Trial profile of patients with breast cancer undergoing axillary lymph node dissection according to allocation to intervention (guidelines, exercise therapy, and manual lymph drainage) or control (guidelines, exercise therapy)
None
Fig 2 Time to develop lymphoedema after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer in 160 patients for two definitions of lymphoedema: increase ≥200 mL in volume or increase ≥2 cm in circumference at two adjacent points
None
Fig 3 Change in difference in arm volume between affected and healthy side compared with preoperative difference 12 months after surgery for breast cancer. Vertical line corresponds to cut-off value for diagnosis of lymphoedema (≥200 mL increase)
None
Fig 4 Maximum increase in difference in arm circumference between affected and healthy side at two or more adjacent measurement points compared with preoperative difference 12 months after surgery for breast cancer. Vertical line corresponds to cut-off value for diagnosis of lymphoedema (≥2 cm increase at two or more adjacent measurement points)

Comment in

References

    1. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784-92. - PubMed
    1. Foldi E, Foldi M, Clodius L. The lymphedema chaos: a lancet. Ann Plast Surg 1989;22:505-15. - PubMed
    1. Stanton AW, Modi S, Mellor RH, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Recent advances in breast cancer-related lymphedema of the arm: lymphatic pump failure and predisposing factors. Lymphat Res Biol 2009;7:29-45. - PubMed
    1. Fleissig A, Fallowfield LJ, Langridge CI, Johnson L, Newcombe RG, Dixon JM, et al. Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;95:279-93. - PubMed
    1. Karki A, Simonen R, Malkia E, Selfe J. Impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions 6 and 12 months after breast cancer operation. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:180-8. - PubMed

Publication types