Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2:112.
doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.83732. Epub 2011 Aug 13.

Spinal cord injury: From inflammation to glial scar

Affiliations

Spinal cord injury: From inflammation to glial scar

Manoel Baldoino Leal-Filho. Surg Neurol Int. 2011.

Abstract

Background: Glial scar (GS) is the most important inhibitor factor to neuroregeneration after spinal cord injury (SCI) and behaves as a tertiary lesion. The present review of the literature searched for representative studies concerning GS and therapeutic strategies to neuroregeneration.

Methods: The author used the PubMed database and Google scholar to search articles published in the last 20 years. Key words used were SCI, spinal cord (SC) inflammation, GS, and SCI treatment.

Results: Both inflammation and GS are considered important events after SCI. Despite the fact that firstly they seem to cause benefit, in the end they cause more harm than good to neuroregeneration. Each stage has its own aspects under the influence of the immune system causing inflammation, from the primary to secondary lesion and from those to GS (tertiary lesion).

Conclusion: Future studies should stress the key points where and when GS presents itself as an inhibitory factor to neuroregeneration. Considering GS as an important event after SCI, the author defends GS as being a tertiary lesion. Current strategies are presented with emphasis on stem cells and drug therapy. A better understanding will permit the development of a therapeutic basis in the treatment of the SCI patients considering each stage of the lesion, with emphasis on GS and neuroregeneration.

Keywords: Glial scar; spinal cord inflammation; spinal cord injury; spinal cord injury treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allan SM, Tyrrell PJ, Rothwell NJ. Interleukin-1 and neuronal injury. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:629–40. - PubMed
    1. Anderson J, Fleming SD, Rehrig S, Tsokos GC, Basta M, Shea-Donohue T. Intravenous immunoglobulin attenuates mesenteric ischemia-reperfusion injury. Clin Immunol. 2005;114:137–46. - PubMed
    1. Attar A, Kaptanoglu E, Aydin Z, Ayten M, Sargon MF. Electron microscopic study of the progeny of ependymal stem cells in the normal and injured spinal cord. Surg Neurol. 2005;64(Suppl 2):S28–32. - PubMed
    1. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Bisgaier CL, Newton RS. Atorvastatin and gemfibrozil metabolites, but not the parent drugs, are potent antioxidants against lipoprotein oxidation. Atherosclerosis. 1998;138:271–80. - PubMed
    1. Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC, Komon J, Tovar CA, Van Meter M, Anderson DK, et al. Endogenous repair after spinal cord contusion injuries in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1997;148:453–63. - PubMed