Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Apr 21;300(6731):1044-5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6731.1044.

Is intrauterine growth retardation with normal umbilical artery blood flow a benign condition?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Is intrauterine growth retardation with normal umbilical artery blood flow a benign condition?

G Burke et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether intrauterine growth retardation associated with normal umbilical artery blood flow is a benign condition.

Design: A prospective comparative study of growth retarded fetuses with normal and abnormal umbilical artery blood flow.

Setting: The fetal assessment clinic of a large maternity hospital in Ireland.

Patients: 179 Women with singleton pregnancies in which the fetal abdominal circumference, measured by ultrasonography, was below the fifth centile for gestation.

Main outcome measures: Perinatal deaths, fetal distress requiring caesarean section, preterm delivery, cerebral irritation.

Results: Of 124 fetuses with normal flow, all physically normal fetuses survived but one baby had cerebral irritation; there were six preterm deliveries and four caesarean sections for fetal distress. Among 55 women with abnormal flow there were two midtrimester abortions, three perinatal deaths, and one case of cerebral irritation in physically normal fetuses.

Conclusions: Intrauterine growth retardation associated with normal umbilical blood flow is a different entity from that associated with abnormal flow, normal flow being largely benign and abnormal flow carrying a serious risk of adverse outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 Sep;87(9):780-5 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Aug;139(2):367-70 - PubMed
    1. Ir Med J. 1983 Feb;76(2):60, 62, 64-6 passim - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb 1;151(3):343-50 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Jul;92(7):666-70 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources