Role of biplane digital subtraction angiography, and 3D rotational angiography in craniopagus twins: A case report, detailed pictorial evaluation, and review of literature
- PMID: 21887192
- PMCID: PMC3162776
- DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.57330
Role of biplane digital subtraction angiography, and 3D rotational angiography in craniopagus twins: A case report, detailed pictorial evaluation, and review of literature
Abstract
Cranially conjoined twins (craniopagus) are regarded as one of the rarest human malformations. Craniopagus represents 2 to 6% of conjoined twins and is the rarest type of disorder. A conventional angiogram with three dimensions is needed to confirm the exact extent of sharing of the arterial / venous tree. 3D angiography was first proposed by CORNELIUS and advanced into clinical practice by VOIGT in 1975. We present a case of craniopagus vertical type II twins, evaluated for cerebral circulation.
Keywords: 3D rotational angiogram; Craniopagus; digital subtraction angiogram.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures








Similar articles
-
Preoperative Evaluation of Craniopagus Twins: Anatomy, Imaging Techniques, and Surgical Management.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):951-959. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6571. Epub 2020 May 21. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 32439641 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurointerventional participation in craniopagus separation.Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;21(4):552-7. doi: 10.1177/1591019915590313. Epub 2015 Jun 10. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015. PMID: 26063696 Free PMC article.
-
Neuroradiological findings in adult cranially conjoined twins. Case report.J Neurosurg. 1998 Oct;89(4):635-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0635. J Neurosurg. 1998. PMID: 9761059
-
Separation of craniopagus twins in the era of modern neuroimaging, interventional neuroradiology, and frameless stereotaxy.Childs Nerv Syst. 2004 Aug;20(8-9):587-92. doi: 10.1007/s00381-004-0986-3. Epub 2004 Jul 27. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004. PMID: 15278383
-
A case of craniopagus parasiticus: an antenatal diagnosis by ultrasound screening at 16 weeks of gestation and a literature review of recently reported cases.Turk J Pediatr. 2019;61(6):941-945. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2019.06.017. Turk J Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 32134590 Review.
Cited by
-
Preoperative Evaluation of Craniopagus Twins: Anatomy, Imaging Techniques, and Surgical Management.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):951-959. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6571. Epub 2020 May 21. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 32439641 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurointerventional participation in craniopagus separation.Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;21(4):552-7. doi: 10.1177/1591019915590313. Epub 2015 Jun 10. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015. PMID: 26063696 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hanson JW. Incidence of conjoined twinning. Lancet. 1975;2:1257. - PubMed
-
- Klucznik RP. Current technology and clinical applications of three-dimensional angiography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:711–28. - PubMed
-
- Schindler E, Hajek P. Craniopagus twins: Neuroradiological findings (CT, Angiography, MRI) Neuroradiolgy. 1988;30:11–6. - PubMed
-
- Kingston CA, McHugh K, Kumaradevan J, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Imaging in the preoperative assessment of conjoined twins. Radiographics. 2001;21:1187–208. - PubMed
-
- Barth RA, Filly RA, Goldberg JD, Moore P, Silverman NH. Conjoined twins: Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of associated malformations. Radiology. 1990;177:201–7. - PubMed