Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 15;118(6):1710-7.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.26459. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer

Affiliations

Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer

Joseph M Letourneau et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The post-treatment quality of life (QOL) impacts of receiving precancer-treatment infertility counseling and of pursuing fertility preservation have not been described in large-scale studies of reproductive age women with cancer.

Methods: In total, 1041 women who were diagnosed between ages 18 and 40 years responded to a retrospective survey and reported whether they received infertility counseling before cancer treatment and whether they took action to preserve fertility. Five cancer types were included: leukemia, Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. Validated QOL scales were used: the Decision Regret Score, the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the brief World Health Organization QOL questionnaire.

Results: Overall, 560 women (61%) who received treatment that potentially could affect fertility were counseled by the oncology team, 45 (5%) were counseled by fertility specialists, and 36 (4%) took action to preserve fertility. Pretreatment infertility counseling by a fertility specialist and an oncologist resulted in lower regret than counseling by an oncologist alone (8.4 vs 11.0; P < .0001). The addition of fertility preservation (6.6 vs 11.0; P < .0001) also was associated with even lower regret scores than counseling by an oncologist alone. Further improvements also were observed in SWLS scores with the addition of fertility specialist counseling (23.0 vs 19.8; P = .09) or preserving fertility (24.0 vs 19.0; P = .05).

Conclusions: Receiving specialized counseling about reproductive loss and pursuing fertility preservation is associated with less regret and greater QOL for survivors, yet few patients are exposed to this potential benefit. Women of reproductive age should have expert counseling and should be given the opportunity to make active decisions about preserving fertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

This project was supported by National Institute of Health Grant Number TL1 RR024129. The National Institute of Health had no role in study design; in collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of this report; or in the decision to submit this paper for publication. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Loprinzi CL, Wolf SL, Barton DL, et al. Symptom management in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:993–1001. - PubMed
    1. Tschudin S, Bitzer J. Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:587–97. - PubMed
    1. Schover LR. Patient attitudes toward fertility preservation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:281–4. - PubMed
    1. Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4174–83. - PubMed
    1. NCIFastStats. Statistics stratified by age. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results(SEER). [online] 2006 http://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/elections.php.

Publication types