Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
- PMID: 21889079
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.015
Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
Abstract
Introduction: The dilemma of extraction vs nonextraction treatment, along with the uncertain potential of orthodontic treatment to control vertical dimensions, still remains among the most controversial issues in orthodontics. The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 contradictory treatment protocols for hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion regarding their effectiveness in controlling vertical dimensions.
Methods: The subjects were retrospectively selected from 2 orthodontic offices that used contrasting treatment protocols. The patients had similar hyperdivergent skeletal patterns, malocclusion patterns, skeletal ages, and sexes. Group A (29 patients) was treated with 4 first premolar extractions and "intrusive" mechanics (eg, high-pull headgear), whereas group B (28 patients) was treated nonextraction with no regard to vertical control (eg, cervical headgear, Class II elastics). Twenty-seven landmarks were digitized on lateral cephalometric radiographs before and after treatment, and 14 measurements were assessed. Geometric morphometric methods were also implemented to evaluate size and shape differences.
Results: As expected, the maxillary and mandibular molars translated mesially and the mandibular incisors uprighted in group A but remained approximately unchanged in group B. The vertical positions of the molars and the incisors were similar between groups before and after treatment, although they were altered by treatment or growth. No significant differences were observed in the posttreatment skeletal measurements between the 2 groups, including vertical variables, which remained unaltered. Permutation tests on Procrustes distances between skeletal shapes confirmed these results.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the limitations of conventional orthodontics to significantly alter skeletal vertical dimensions. More important factors are probably responsible for the development and establishment of the vertical skeletal pattern, such as neuromuscular balance and function.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Questioning treatment strategies in hyperdivergent patients.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Apr;141(4):396; author reply 396-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.016. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22464516 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):508-16. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm051. Eur J Orthod. 2007. PMID: 17974541
-
Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Dec;130(6):732-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.028. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006. PMID: 17169735
-
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17628251 Clinical Trial.
-
Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes in growing class II malocclusion patients during nonextraction orthodontic treatment.SADJ. 2006 Sep;61(8):344-50. SADJ. 2006. PMID: 17165248 Review.
-
Vertical effects of cervical headgear in growing patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;46(1):cjad053. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad053. Eur J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 37866376 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0118810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118810. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25706151 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in apical base sagittal relationship in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without premolar extractions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):338-355. doi: 10.2319/030716-198.1. Epub 2016 Sep 6. Angle Orthod. 2017. PMID: 27598907 Free PMC article.
-
Camouflage treatment guided by facial improvement in hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Feb;10(4):163. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-135. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 35280430 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic treatment of an adolescent patient with Class II division 1 malocclusion with consideration of growth pattern and occlusal plane: A case report.Clin Case Rep. 2021 May 15;9(5):e04244. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4244. eCollection 2021 May. Clin Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 34026198 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of the combination of myofunctional therapy (lip exercises) and activator high-pull headgear in the closure of interlabial gap in long-face skeletal class II patients with lip incompetence: A 6-8-month longitudinal randomized clinical trial.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Jan 25;21:3. eCollection 2024. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024. PMID: 38425317 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials