Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 20;412(23-24):2284-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.08.023. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

Sample collection and handling considerations for peptidomic studies in whole saliva; implications for biomarker discovery

Ebbing P de Jong  1 , Susan K van Riper, Joseph S Koopmeiners, John V Carlis, Timothy J Griffin
Affiliations

Sample collection and handling considerations for peptidomic studies in whole saliva; implications for biomarker discovery

Ebbing P de Jong et al. Clin Chim Acta. .

Abstract

Background: Proteomic studies in saliva have demonstrated its potential as a diagnostic biofluid, however the salivary peptidome is less studied. Here we study the effects of several sample collection and handling factors on salivary peptide abundance levels.

Methods: Salivary peptides were isolated using an ultrafiltration device and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. A panel of 41 peptides common after various treatments were quantified and normalized. We evaluated the effects of freezing rate of the samples, nutritional status of the donors (fed vs. fasted), and room-temperature sample degradation on peptide abundance levels. Repeatability of our sample processing method and our instrumental analysis method were investigated.

Results: Increased sample freezing rate produced higher levels of peptides. Donor nutritional status had no influence on the levels of measured peptides. No significant difference was detected in donors' saliva following 5, 10 and 15 min of room-temperature degradation. Sample processing and instrumental variability were relatively small, with median CVs of 9.6 and 6.6.

Conclusions: Peptide abundance levels in saliva are rather forgiving towards variations in sample handling and donor nutritional status. Differences in freezing methods may affect peptide abundance, so consistency in freezing samples is preferred. Our results are valuable for standardizing sample collection and handling methods for peptidomic-based biomarker studies in saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots of the standardized (i.e. divided by their standard deviation) differences between peptides measured from samples frozen at −20 and −80 °C (frozen at −80 – frozen at −20), p = 0.002.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots of the standardized differences between peptides measured from samples under fasting and fed conditions (fed – fasted), p = 0.848.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box plots of the standardized differences between peptides measured 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 24 hours compared to baseline, p equal to 0.065, 0.824, 0.602, 0.024, respectively.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schipper RG, Silletti E, Vinyerhoeds MH. Saliva as research material: Biochemical, physicochemical and practical aspects. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52:1114–1135. - PubMed
    1. Pink R, Simek J, Vondrakova J, et al. Saliva as a diagnostic medium. Biomed. Pap-Olomouc. 2009;153:103–110. - PubMed
    1. Townsend S, Fanning L, O'Kennedy R. Salivary analysis of drugs - Potential and difficulties. Anal Lett. 2008;41:925–948.
    1. Chiappin S, Antonelli G, Gatti R, De Palo EF. Saliva specimen: A new laboratory tool for diagnostic and basic investigation. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;383:30–40. - PubMed
    1. Streckfus CF, Bigler LR. Saliva as a diagnostic fluid. Oral Dis. 2002;8:69–76. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources