Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;87(1):54-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.027. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

A conceptual model of the role of communication in surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults

Affiliations

A conceptual model of the role of communication in surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults

Alexia M Torke et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To build a conceptual model of the role of communication in decision making, based on literature from medicine, communication studies and medical ethics.

Methods: We proposed a model and described each construct in detail. We review what is known about interpersonal and patient-physician communication, described literature about surrogate-clinician communication, and discussed implications for our developing model.

Results: The communication literature proposes two major elements of interpersonal communication: information processing and relationship building. These elements are composed of constructs such as information disclosure and emotional support that are likely to be relevant to decision making. We propose these elements of communication impact decision making, which in turn affects outcomes for both patients and surrogates. Decision making quality may also mediate the relationship between communication and outcomes.

Conclusion: Although many elements of the model have been studied in relation to patient-clinician communication, there is limited data about surrogate decision making. There is evidence of high surrogate distress associated with decision making that may be alleviated by communication-focused interventions. More research is needed to test the relationships proposed in the model.

Practice implications: Good communication with surrogates may improve both the quality of medical decisions and outcomes for the patient and surrogate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Conceptual Model of Communication and Surrogate Decision Making

References

    1. Dubler NN. The doctor-proxy relationship: the neglected connection. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Dec;5(4):289–306. - PubMed
    1. Post LF, Blustein J, Dubler NN. The doctor-proxy relationship: an untapped resource: introduction. J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Spring;27(1):5–12. - PubMed
    1. Torke AM, Alexander GC, Lantos J, Siegler M. The physician-surrogate relationship. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 11;167(11):1117–1121. - PubMed
    1. Baker R, Wu AW, Teno JM, et al. Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(5 Suppl):S61–69. - PubMed
    1. Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. J Amer Med Assoc. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88–93. - PubMed

Publication types