Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):72-8.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000332. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

Prevalence of medication administration errors in two medical units with automated prescription and dispensing

Carmen Guadalupe Rodriguez-Gonzalez  1 , Ana Herranz-Alonso, Maria Luisa Martin-Barbero, Esther Duran-Garcia, Maria Isabel Durango-Limarquez, Paloma Hernández-Sampelayo, Maria Sanjurjo-Saez
Affiliations

Prevalence of medication administration errors in two medical units with automated prescription and dispensing

Carmen Guadalupe Rodriguez-Gonzalez et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To identify the frequency of medication administration errors and their potential risk factors in units using a computerized prescription order entry program and profiled automated dispensing cabinets.

Design: Prospective observational study conducted within two clinical units of the Gastroenterology Department in a 1537-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Madrid (Spain).

Measurements: Medication errors were measured using the disguised observation technique. Types of medication errors and their potential severity were described. The correlation between potential risk factors and medication errors was studied to identify potential causes.

Results: In total, 2314 medication administrations to 73 patients were observed: 509 errors were recorded (22.0%)-68 (13.4%) in preparation and 441 (86.6%) in administration. The most frequent errors were use of wrong administration techniques (especially concerning food intake (13.9%)), wrong reconstitution/dilution (1.7%), omission (1.4%), and wrong infusion speed (1.2%). Errors were classified as no damage (95.7%), no damage but monitoring required (2.3%), and temporary damage (0.4%). Potential clinical severity could not be assessed in 1.6% of cases. The potential risk factors morning shift, evening shift, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical medication class antacids, prokinetics, antibiotics and immunosuppressants, oral administration, and intravenous administration were associated with a higher risk of administration errors. No association was found with variables related to understaffing or nurse's experience.

Conclusions: Medication administration errors persist in units with automated prescription and dispensing. We identified a need to improve nurses' working procedures and to implement a Clinical Decision Support tool that generates recommendations about scheduling according to dietary restrictions, preparation of medication before parenteral administration, and adequate infusion rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991;324:377–84 - PubMed
    1. National Study on Hospitalisation-Related Adverse Events. ENEAS. Madrid: Secretary Of Health. Quality Agency Administration National Health System; 2005
    1. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995;274:35–43 - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995;274:29–34 - PubMed
    1. Barker KN, Pearson RE, Hepler CD, et al. Effect of an automated bedside dispensing machine on medication errors. Am J Hosp Pharm 1984;41:1352–8 - PubMed

Publication types