Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 1;66(19):4356-4369.
doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.04.033.

Enhanced Inter-helical Residue Contact Prediction in Transmembrane Proteins

Affiliations

Enhanced Inter-helical Residue Contact Prediction in Transmembrane Proteins

Y Wei et al. Chem Eng Sci. .

Abstract

In this paper, based on a recent work by McAllister and Floudas who developed a mathematical optimization model to predict the contacts in transmembrane alpha-helical proteins from a limited protein data set [1], we have enhanced this method by 1) building a more comprehensive data set for transmembrane alpha-helical proteins and this enhanced data set is then used to construct the probability sets, MIN-1N and MIN-2N, for residue contact prediction, 2) enhancing the mathematical model via modifications of several important physical constraints and 3) applying a new blind contact prediction scheme on different protein sets proposed from analyzing the contact prediction on 65 proteins from Fuchs et al. [2]. The blind contact prediction scheme has been tested on two different membrane protein sets. Firstly it is applied to five carefully selected proteins from the training set. The contact prediction of these five proteins uses probability sets built by excluding the target protein from the training set, and an average accuracy of 56% was obtained. Secondly, it is applied to six independent membrane proteins with complicated topologies, and the prediction accuracies are 73% for 2ZY9A, 21% for 3KCUA, 46% for 2W1PA, 64% for 3CN5A, 77% for 3IXZA and 83% for 3K3FA. The average prediction accuracy for the six proteins is 60.7%. The proposed approach is also compared with a support vector machine method (TMhit [3]) and it is shown that it exhibits better prediction accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A cartoon illustrating the residue contact prediction for 1M0KA. Blue lines show the correct predictions while the red dotted line represents the false prediction between 207L (pink) and 14A (blue).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A cartoon illustrating the residue contact prediction for 1H2SA. Blue lines show the correct predictions while the red dotted lines represent the false predictions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McAllister SR, Floudas CA. alpha-helical topology prediction and generation of distance restraints in membrane proteins. Biophys J. 2008;95:5281–5295. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fuchs A, Firschner A, Frishman D. Prediction of helix-helix contacts and interacting helices in polytopic membrane proteins using neural networks. Proteins. 2009;74:857–871. - PubMed
    1. Lo A, Chiu YY, Rødland EA, Lyu PC, Sung TY, Hsu WL. Predicting helix-helix interactions from residue contacts in membrane proteins. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:996–1003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Current opinion in structural biology. 2008;18(3):342–348. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Floudas CA, Fung HK, McAllister SR, Monnigmann M, Rajgaria R. Advances in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design: A review. Chemical Engineering Science. 2006;61:966–988.

LinkOut - more resources