Evaluation of Image Enhancement Method on Target Registration Using Cone Beam CT in Radiation Therapy
- PMID: 21892290
- PMCID: PMC3161701
- DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s512
Evaluation of Image Enhancement Method on Target Registration Using Cone Beam CT in Radiation Therapy
Abstract
An intensity based six-degree image registration algorithm between cone-beam CT (CBCT) and planning CT has been developed for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). CT images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom were acquired using conventional CT scanner and corresponding CBCT was reconstructed based on projection images acquired by an on-board imager (OBI). Both sets of images were initially registered to each other using attached fudicial markers to achieve a golden standard registration. Starting from this point, an offset was applied to one set of images, and the matching result was found by a gray-value based registration method. Finally, The registration error was evaluated by comparing the detected shifts with the known shift. Three window-level (WL) combinations commonly used for image enhancement were examined to investigate the effect of anatomical information of Bony only (B), Bone+Tissue (BT), and Bone+Tissue+Air (BTA) on the accuracy and robustness of gray-value based registration algorithm. Extensive tests were performed in searching for the attraction range of registration algorithm. The widest attraction range was achieved with the WL combination of BTA. The average attraction ranges of this combination were 73.3 mm and 81.6 degree in the translation and rotation dimensions, respectively, and the average registration errors were 0.15 mm and 0.32 degree. The WL combination of BT shows the secondary largest attraction ranges. The WL combination of B shows limited convergence property and its attraction range was the smallest among the three examined combinations (on average 33.3 mm and 25.0 degree). If two sets of 3D images in original size (512 × 512) were used, registration could be accomplished within 10~20 minutes by current algorithm, which is only acceptable for off-line reviewing purpose. As the size of image set reduced by a factor of 2~4, the registration time would be 2~4 minutes which is feasible for on-line target localization.
Keywords: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); image registration; image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT).
Figures






Similar articles
-
Quantitative evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography-planning computed tomography deformable image registration method for adaptive radiation therapy.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007 Nov 5;8(4):96-113. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i4.2432. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007. PMID: 18449149 Free PMC article.
-
Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.011. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005. PMID: 15736320
-
Quantitative cone-beam CT imaging in radiation therapy using planning CT as a prior: first patient studies.Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1991-2000. doi: 10.1118/1.3693050. Med Phys. 2012. PMID: 22482620 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of automated image registration algorithm for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2012 Sep;35(3):311-9. doi: 10.1007/s13246-012-0158-9. Epub 2012 Sep 5. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2012. PMID: 22948720
-
A Monte Carlo study to investigate the feasibility of an on-board SPECT/spectral-CT/CBCT imager for medical linear accelerator.Med Phys. 2020 Oct;47(10):5112-5122. doi: 10.1002/mp.14398. Epub 2020 Aug 7. Med Phys. 2020. PMID: 32681649
Cited by
-
Study to Compare the Effect of Different Registration Methods on Patient Setup Uncertainties in Cone-beam Computed Tomography during Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients.J Med Phys. 2018 Oct-Dec;43(4):207-213. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_67_18. J Med Phys. 2018. PMID: 30636845 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jaffray DA, et al. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1337–1349. - PubMed
-
- Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2000;27:1311–1323. - PubMed
-
- Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. Med Phys. 2001;28:220–231. - PubMed
-
- Yan D, Lockman D, Brabbins D, et al. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:289–302. - PubMed
-
- Letourneau D, Martinez AA, Lockman D, Yan C, Vargas C, Ivaldi G, Wong J. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1239–1246. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials