Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008:2:289-99.
doi: 10.4137/cmo.s512. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

Evaluation of Image Enhancement Method on Target Registration Using Cone Beam CT in Radiation Therapy

Evaluation of Image Enhancement Method on Target Registration Using Cone Beam CT in Radiation Therapy

Hui Yan et al. Clin Med Oncol. 2008.

Abstract

An intensity based six-degree image registration algorithm between cone-beam CT (CBCT) and planning CT has been developed for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). CT images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom were acquired using conventional CT scanner and corresponding CBCT was reconstructed based on projection images acquired by an on-board imager (OBI). Both sets of images were initially registered to each other using attached fudicial markers to achieve a golden standard registration. Starting from this point, an offset was applied to one set of images, and the matching result was found by a gray-value based registration method. Finally, The registration error was evaluated by comparing the detected shifts with the known shift. Three window-level (WL) combinations commonly used for image enhancement were examined to investigate the effect of anatomical information of Bony only (B), Bone+Tissue (BT), and Bone+Tissue+Air (BTA) on the accuracy and robustness of gray-value based registration algorithm. Extensive tests were performed in searching for the attraction range of registration algorithm. The widest attraction range was achieved with the WL combination of BTA. The average attraction ranges of this combination were 73.3 mm and 81.6 degree in the translation and rotation dimensions, respectively, and the average registration errors were 0.15 mm and 0.32 degree. The WL combination of BT shows the secondary largest attraction ranges. The WL combination of B shows limited convergence property and its attraction range was the smallest among the three examined combinations (on average 33.3 mm and 25.0 degree). If two sets of 3D images in original size (512 × 512) were used, registration could be accomplished within 10~20 minutes by current algorithm, which is only acceptable for off-line reviewing purpose. As the size of image set reduced by a factor of 2~4, the registration time would be 2~4 minutes which is feasible for on-line target localization.

Keywords: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); image registration; image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CT image enhancement. (a) Histogram and three sets of window-level ranges: Bone only (B), Bone + Tissue (BT), and Bone + Tissue + Air (BTA). (b)–(d) are the resulting CT images.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CBCT image enhancement. (a) Histogram and three sets of window-level ranges: Bone only (B), Bone + Tissue (BT), and Bone + Tissue + Air (BTA). (b)–(d) are the resulting CBCT images.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a)–(c) CC profiles and (d)–(f) MI profiles of the three combinations of CT and CBCT enhancement methods. In each plot, three curves represent the rotation profiles and another three curves represent the translation profiles. Each profile was labeled by respective style of line. The X axes indicate the shifts in mm and deg in six dimensions, and the Y axes are the values of CC and MI.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Registration grid plots for the WL combinations of (a) B, (b) BT, and (c) BTA. The X axes are the initial offset (mm for translations, deg for rotations), and the Y axes are the dimensions offset were made. Each symbol represents one registration trial. A dot “•” indicates that the initial offset was successfully detected, and an “ ” indicates failure of registration, i.e. the error is more than 1 mm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Absolute attraction ranges of the three WL combinations in six dimensions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Graphic illustration of step (5) of simplex searching algorithm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jaffray DA, et al. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1337–1349. - PubMed
    1. Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2000;27:1311–1323. - PubMed
    1. Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. Med Phys. 2001;28:220–231. - PubMed
    1. Yan D, Lockman D, Brabbins D, et al. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:289–302. - PubMed
    1. Letourneau D, Martinez AA, Lockman D, Yan C, Vargas C, Ivaldi G, Wong J. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1239–1246. - PubMed