Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep 6;8(10):554-64.
doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.141.

Colonoscopy: basic principles and novel techniques

Affiliations
Review

Colonoscopy: basic principles and novel techniques

Yark Hazewinkel et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

Colonoscopy is considered the 'gold standard' for detection and removal of premalignant lesions in the colon. However, studies suggest that colonoscopy is less protective for right-sided than for left-sided colorectal cancer. Optimizing the effectiveness of colonoscopy is a continuous process, and during the past decade several important quality indicators have been defined that can be used to measure the performance of colonoscopy and to identify areas for quality improvement. The quality of bowel preparation can be enhanced by split-dose regimens, which are superior to single-dose regimens. Cecal intubation rates should approximate 95% and can be optimized by good technique. In selected patients, specific devices can be used to facilitate cecal intubation. Adenoma detection rates should be monitored and exceed a minimum of 25% in men and 15% in women. To this aim, optimal withdrawal technique and adequate time for inspection are of utmost importance. Of all advanced imaging techniques, chromoendoscopy is the only technique with proven benefit for adenoma detection. Finally, the technique of polypectomy affects the number of complications as well as the success of completely removing a lesion. In this Review, we provide an overview of both standard and novel colonoscopy techniques and their impact on quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 Nov-Dec;35(6):536-40 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan;104(1):41-6 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 2007 Jun;132(7):2297-303 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 2008 Jan;57(1):65-70 - PubMed