Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;25(6):1139-47.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.524193. Epub 2011 May 24.

How do social fears in adolescence develop? Fear conditioning shapes attention orienting to social threat cues

Affiliations

How do social fears in adolescence develop? Fear conditioning shapes attention orienting to social threat cues

Anneke D M Haddad et al. Cogn Emot. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Social fears emerging in adolescence can have negative effects on emotional well-being. Yet the mechanisms by which these risks occur are unknown. One possibility is that associative learning results in fears to previously neutral social stimuli. Such conditioned responses may alter subsequent processing of social stimuli. We used a novel conditioning task to examine how associative processes influence social fear and attention orienting in adolescents. Neutral photographs were paired with socially rewarding or aversive stimuli during conditioning; a dot-probe task then assessed biases in attention orienting. The social conditioning task modified subjective ratings of the neutral stimuli. Moreover, for the neutral stimulus that was paired with the aversive stimulus, the strength of conditioning showed a relationship with subsequent attentional vigilance. The findings elucidate mechanisms by which negative peer experiences during adolescence may affect emotional processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subjective pleasantness (top) and scariness (bottom) ratings (mean±SEM) for each CS following baseline, acquisition, and extinction trials showing that conditioning modified perceptions of the neutral stimuli.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between post-acquisition scariness ratings and attentional bias scores for the CSneg; both the linear and quadratic models are displayed, but the quadratic model showed a significantly improved fit over the linear model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): A replication study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1999;38:1230–1236. - PubMed
    1. Davey GC. UCS revaluation and conditioning models of acquired fears. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1989;27:521–528. - PubMed
    1. Esteves F, Parra C, Dimberg U, Öhman A. Nonconscious associative learning: Pavlo-vian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli. Psychophysiology. 1994;31:375–385. - PubMed
    1. Guyer AE, McClure-Tone EB, Shiffrin ND, Pine DS, Nelson EE. Probing the neural correlates of anticipated peer evaluation in adolescence. Child Development. 2009;80:1000–1015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawker DS, Boulton MJ. Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 2000;41:441–455. - PubMed

Publication types