Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Oct;6(10):1469-74.
doi: 10.4161/psb.6.10.17345. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

Revealing plant defense signaling: getting more sophisticated with phosphoproteomics

Affiliations
Review

Revealing plant defense signaling: getting more sophisticated with phosphoproteomics

Tim Xing et al. Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

The regulation mechanisms of any plant-pathogen interaction are complex and dynamic. A proteomic approach is necessary in understanding regulatory networks because it identifies new proteins in relation to their function and ultimately aims to clarify how their expression, accumulation and modification is controlled. One of the major control mechanisms for protein activity in plant-pathogen interactions is protein phosphorylation, and an understanding of the significance of protein phosphorylation in plant-pathogen interaction can be overwhelming. Due to the high number of protein kinases and phosphatases in any single plant genome and specific limitations of any technologies, it is extremely challenging for us to fully delineate the phosphorylation machinery. Current proteomic approaches and technology advances have demonstrated their great potential in identifying new components. Recent studies in well-developed plant-pathogen systems have revealed novel phosphorylation pathways, and some of them are off the core phosphorylation cascades. Additional phosphoproteomic studies are needed to increase our comprehension of the different mechanisms and their fine tuning involved in the host resistance response to pathogen attacks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phosphorylation regulation of plant defense mechanisms and challenges to phosphoproteomic approaches.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peck SC. Analysis of protein phosphorylation: methods and strategies for studying kinases and substrates. Plant J. 2006;45:512–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02613.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oeljeklaus S, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. Advancements in plant proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry. J Proteomics. 2009;72:545–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.11.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thurston G, Regan S, Rampitsch C, Xing T. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic approaches to understanding plant-pathogen interactions. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2005;66:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.03.004. - DOI
    1. Posewitz MC, Tempst P. Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal Chem. 1999;71:2883–2892. doi: 10.1021/ac981409y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kersten B, Agrawa GK, Durek P, Neigenfind J, Schulze W, Walther D, et al. Plant phosphoproteomics: An update. Proteomics. 2009;9:964–988. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800548. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources