Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;27(3):358-61.
doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.83682.

Endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring during neurosurgery - Manual vs. automatic method

Affiliations

Endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring during neurosurgery - Manual vs. automatic method

Mukul Kumar Jain et al. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Inflation and assessment of the endotracheal tube cuff pressure is often not appreciated as a critical aspect of endotracheal intubation. Appropriate endotracheal tube cuff pressure, endotracheal intubation seals the airway to prevent aspiration and provides for positive-pressure ventilation without air leak.

Materials and methods: Correlations between manual methods of assessing the pressure by an experienced anesthesiologists and assessment with maintenance of the pressure within the normal range by the automated pressure controller device were studied in 100 patients divided into two groups. In Group M, endotracheal tube cuff was inflated manually by a trained anesthesiologist and checked for its pressure hourly by cuff pressure monitor till the end of surgery. In Group C, endotracheal tube cuff was inflated by automated cuff pressure controller and pressure was maintained at 25-cm H(2)O throughout the surgeries. Repeated measure ANOVA was applied.

Results: Repeated measure ANOVA results showed that average of endotracheal tube cuff pressure of 50 patients taken at seven different points is significantly different (F-value: 171.102, P-value: 0.000). Bonferroni correction test shows that average of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in all six groups are significantly different from constant group (P = 0.000). No case of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, tracheal stenosis, tracheoesophageal fistula or aspiration pneumonitis was observed.

Conclusions: Endotracheal tube cuff pressure was significantly high when endotracheal tube cuff was inflated manually. The known complications of high endotracheal tube cuff pressure can be avoided if the cuff pressure controller device is used and manual methods cannot be relied upon for keeping the pressure within the recommended levels.

Keywords: Automatic cuff pressure controller; endotracheal tube cuff pressure; manual method; neurosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of ETTc pressure at different time in different groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dullenkopf A, Gerber A, Weiss M. Fluid leakage past tracheal tube cuffs: Evaluation of the new Microcuff endotracheal tube. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1849–53. - PubMed
    1. Lien TC, Wang JH. Incidence of pulmonary aspiration with different kinds of artificial airways. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1992;49:348–53. - PubMed
    1. Bernhard WN, Yost L, Joynes D, Cothalis S, Turndorf H. Intracuff pressures in endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes.Related cuff physical characteristics. Chest. 1985;87:720–5. - PubMed
    1. Parwani V, Hahn I, Hsu B, Hoffman R. Experienced emergency physicians cannot safely or accurately inflate endotracheal tube cuffs or estimate endotracheal tube cuff pressure using standard technique [abstract] Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:490. - PubMed
    1. Mandoe H, Nikolajsen L, Lintrup U, Jepsen D, Molgaard J. Sore throat after endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:897–900. - PubMed