Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;2(2):162-7.
doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.83584.

Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques

Affiliations

Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques

Seckin Aydin et al. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Cranioplasty is the surgical intervention to repair cranial defects. The aim of cranioplasty is not only a cosmetic issue; also, the repair of cranial defects gives relief to psychological drawbacks and increases the social performances. Many different types of materials were used throughout the history of cranioplasty. With the evolving biomedical technology, new materials are available to be used by the surgeons. Although many different materials and techniques had been described, there is still no consensus about the best material, and ongoing researches on both biologic and nonbiologic substitutions continue aiming to develop the ideal reconstruction materials. In this article, the principle materials and techniques of cranioplasty are reviewed.

Keywords: Allograft; autograft; cranioplasty; reconstruction; skull defects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative view of one of our cases demonstrating the application fascia lata graft. (B: boney skull, F: fascia lata)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Silicon cranioplasty kit
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Porous polyethylene cranioplasty kit types, (b) postoperative head CT-scan of one of our cases demonstrating the defect reconstructed with porous polyethylene (arrow)
Figure 4
Figure 4
One of our cases with skull defect reconstructed with Cortoss™. (a) Intraoperative view of Cortoss™ use, (b) postoperative head 3D CT-scan demonstrating the defect reconstructed with Cortoss™ (arrows)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Titanium cranioplasty kit. (a) Titanium plate, (b) titanium mesh

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sanan A, Haines SJ. Repairing holes in the head: A history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:588–603. - PubMed
    1. Rish BL, Dillon JD, Meirowsky AM, Caveness WF, Mohr JP, Kistler JP, et al. Cranioplasty: A review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. Neurosurgery. 1979;4:381–5. - PubMed
    1. Blake DP. The use of synthetics in cranioplasty: A clinical review. Mil Med. 1994;159:466–9. - PubMed
    1. Prolo DJ, Burres KP, McLaughlin WT, Christensen AH. Autogenous skull cranioplasty: Fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response. Neurosurgery. 1979;4:18–29. - PubMed
    1. Viterbo F, Palhares A, Modenese E. Cranioplasty: The autograft option. J Craniofac Surg. 1995;6:80–3. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources