Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;2(3):158-64.
doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.83279.

Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India

Affiliations

Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India

Nutanbala N Goswami et al. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To find out the most common bacterial pathogens responsible for post-operative wound infection and their antibiotic sensitivity profile.

Materials and methods: This prospective, observational study was carried out in patients of postoperative wound infection. Samples from wound discharge were collected using a sterile swab and studied for identification of isolates by Gram stains and culture growth followed by in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing performed by disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar.

Results: Out of 183 organisms, 126 (68.85%) isolated organisms were gram negative. Staphylococcus aureus, 48 (26.23%), was the predominant organism. S. aureus was sensitive to rifampicin (89.58%), levofloxacin (60.42%), and vancomycin (54.17%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (83.78%), gatifloxacin (51.35%), and meropenem (51.35%). Escherichia coli was sensitive to levofloxacin (72.41%) and ciprofloxacin (62.07%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (63.16%), levofloxacin (63.16%), gatifloxacin (63.16%), and linezolid (56.52%). Proteus mirabilis was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (75%) and linezolid (62.50). Proteus vulgaris was sensitive to ampicillin+sulbactam (57.14%) followed by levofloxacin (50%).

Conclusions: There is an alarming increase of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, particularly in the emergence of VRSA/VISA, meropenem, and third generation cephalosporin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Linezolid showing sensitivity against Gram negative bacteria.

Keywords: Antibiogram; antibiotic sensitivity; bacterial resistance; gram negative bacteria; gram positive bacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sensitivity of commonly used antibiotics for gram positive bacteria
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensitivity of commonly used antibiotics for gram negative bacteria

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashby E, Haddad FS, O’Donnell E, Wilson AP. How will surgical site infection be measured to ensure “high quality care for all”? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1294–9. - PubMed
    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999.Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–78. - PubMed
    1. Tiwari HK, Sen MR. Emergence of vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a tertiary care hospital from northern part of India. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemant Singhal, Kanchan Kaur. Wound infection. Overview: History. The ancient Egyptians were the first civilization to have trained clinicians to treat physical aliments. eMed General Surg 2009. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2009;10:323–31. - PubMed
    1. Chastre J, Trouillet JL. Problem pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter) Semin Respir Infect. 2000;15:287–98. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources