Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;2(3):109-12.
doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.83221.

Intention-to-treat concept: A review

Sandeep K Gupta  1
Affiliations

Intention-to-treat concept: A review

Sandeep K Gupta. Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials often suffer from two major complications, i.e., noncompliance and missing outcomes. One potential solution to this problem is a statistical concept called intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. ITT analysis includes every subject who is randomized according to randomized treatment assignment. It ignores noncompliance, protocol deviations, withdrawal, and anything that happens after randomization. ITT analysis maintains prognostic balance generated from the original random treatment allocation. In ITT analysis, estimate of treatment effect is generally conservative. A better application of the ITT approach is possible if complete outcome data are available for all randomized subjects. Per-protocol population is defined as a subset of the ITT population who completed the study without any major protocol violations.

Keywords: Intention-to-treat analysis; per-protocol analysis; randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Fisher LD, Dixon DO, Herson J, Frankowski RK, Hearron MS, Peace KE. Intention to treat in clinical trials. In: Peace KE, editor. Statistical issues in drug research and development. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1990. pp. 331–50.
    1. Newel DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: Implications for quantitative and qualitative research. Int J Epidemiol. 1992;21:837–41. - PubMed
    1. Wertz RT. Intention to treat: Once randomized, always analyzed. Clin Aphasiol. 1995;23:57–64.
    1. Heritier SR, Gebski VJ, Keech AC. Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: The intention-to-treat principle. Med J Aust. 2003;179:438–40. - PubMed
    1. LaValley MP. Intent-to-treat analysis of randomized clinical trials. 2003. [Last accessed on 2011 Jan 12]. Available from: http://people.bu.edu/mlava/ITT%20Workshop.pdf .