Similar articles

• What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.

  Gupta P, Kaur G, Sharma B, Shah D, Choudhury P. Gupta P, et al. Indian Pediatr. 2006 Jun;43(6):479-89. Indian Pediatr. 2006. PMID: 16820657
• Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?

  Schachat AP. Schachat AP. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;143(4):677-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.01.023. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17386274 No abstract available.
• [The impact factor and editorial decisions].

  Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R. Matías-Guiu J, et al. Neurologia. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(6):342-8. Neurologia. 2008. PMID: 18597189 Spanish.
• The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias.

  Opthof T, Coronel R, Janse MJ. Opthof T, et al. Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Dec;56(3):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00712-5. Cardiovasc Res. 2002. PMID: 12445872 Review. No abstract available.
• The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions.

  Adams J. Adams J. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):19-32. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0003-3. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009. PMID: 19219531 Review.