Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Sep 7:(9):CD006760.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006760.pub2.

Specialised antenatal clinics for women with a pregnancy at high risk of preterm birth (excluding multiple pregnancy) to improve maternal and infant outcomes

Melissa Whitworth  1 , Siobhan Quenby, Ruth O Cockerill, Therese Dowswell
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Specialised antenatal clinics for women with a pregnancy at high risk of preterm birth (excluding multiple pregnancy) to improve maternal and infant outcomes

Melissa Whitworth et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Amongst the risk factors for preterm birth, previous preterm delivery is a strong predictor. Specialised clinics for women with a history of spontaneous preterm delivery have been advocated as a way of improving outcomes for women and their infants.

Objectives: To assess using the best available evidence, the value of specialised antenatal clinics for women with a pregnancy at high risk of preterm delivery when compared with 'standard' antenatal clinics.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2011).

Selection criteria: All published, unpublished, and ongoing randomised controlled trials (including cluster-randomised trials) examining specialised compared with standard antenatal clinic care for women with a singleton pregnancy considered at high risk of preterm labour.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

Main results: We included three trials with 3400 women, all carried out in the USA. All focused on specialised clinics for women at high risk of preterm birth. Gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery, or both were primary outcomes in all studies. The interventions in the three trials differed.Overall there was very little data on our prespecified outcomes. For most outcomes a single study provided data, hence there was not the statistical power to detect any possible differences between groups. There was no clear evidence that specialised antenatal clinics reduce the number of preterm births.

Authors' conclusions: Specialised antenatal clinics are now an accepted part of care in many settings, and carrying out further randomised trials may not be possible. Any future research in this area should include psychological outcomes and should focus on which aspects of service provision are preferred by women. Such research could underpin further service development in this area.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Iams JD, Johnson FF. Effect of a preterm birth prevention program on the diagnosis and treatment of preterm labor in high risk patients. Proceedings of 9th Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 1989 Feb 1-4.1989. p. 387.
    1. Main DM, Gabbe SG, Richardson D, Strong S. Can preterm deliveries be prevented? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1985;151:892–8. - PubMed
    2. Main DM, Richardson DK, Hadley CB, Gabbe SG. Controlled trial of a preterm labor detection program: efficacy and costs. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1989;74:873–7. - PubMed
    1. Hobel CJ, Bemis RL. West Area Los Angeles prematurity prevention demonstration project. Prevention of Preterm Birth. 1986;138:205–22.
    2. Hobel CJ, Bragonier R, Ross M, Bear M, Bemis R, Mori B. West Los Angeles premature prevention program: significant impact. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 1987;15:112.
    3. Hobel CJ, Ross MG, Bemis RL, Bragonier JR, Bear M, Mori B. West Los Angeles preterm birth prevention project (LAPPP): program impact. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;166:363. - PubMed
    4. Hobel CJ, Ross MG, Bemis RL, Bragonier JR, Nessim S, Sandhu M, et al. The West Los Angeles preterm birth prevention project: I. program impact on high-risk women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994;170:54–62. - PubMed
    5. Ross MG, Sandhu M, Bemis R, Nessim S, Bragonier JR, Hobel C. The West Los Angeles preterm birth prevention project: II. cost-effectiveness analysis of high-risk pregnancy interventions. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994;83:506–11. - PubMed
    6. Ross MG, Sandhu M, Bemis R, Nessim S, Bragonier JR, Mori B, et al. West Los Angeles preterm birth prevention project (LAPPP): cost benefit of high risk pregnancy interventions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;166:367.
    1. Beazley D, Mercer B, Meyer N, Carr T. The Memphis preterm birth project: prediction and prevention of preterm birth in extremely high risk women [abstract] American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001;185(6 Suppl):S86.
    1. Collaborative Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a preterm birth prevention program. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1993;169:352–66. - PubMed
    2. Creasy RK. United States multicenter preterm birth prevention program. Prevention of Preterm Birth. 1986;138:187–204.