Natural-Y Même polyurethane versus smooth silicone: analysis of the soft-tissue interaction from 3 days to 1 year in the rat animal model
- PMID: 2190246
- DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199006000-00011
Natural-Y Même polyurethane versus smooth silicone: analysis of the soft-tissue interaction from 3 days to 1 year in the rat animal model
Abstract
The polyurethane foam-covered breast prosthesis is experiencing increased clinical use. The polyurethane is felt to be responsible for altering capsule formation and reducing the contracture rate. This study characterizes the soft-tissue response to the Natural-Y Même polyurethane foam versus smooth silicone in a rat model. Implants were fashioned from an unbacked polyurethane foam specimen used to cover the Natural-Y prosthesis, a silicone shell covered with the Natural-Y foam, and a smooth silicone control. Materials were placed subcutaneously into the backs of male Lew/SsN rats (n = 81) for 3, 7, 14, and 28 days and 3, 6, and 12 months. Implants were then harvested with their soft-tissue response and evaluated histologically. Analysis demonstrates that microstructuring of a surface, as opposed to a smooth material, will dramatically alter the early, intermediate, and late wound-healing events. The soft-tissue response was observed to be dependent on implant site, material chemistry, and morphology as characterized by exudate formation, macrophage invasion, multinucleated giant cell formation, collagen deposition, foam degradation, and angiogenesis.
Similar articles
-
Early tissue reaction to textured breast implant surfaces.Ann Plast Surg. 1992 Apr;28(4):354-62. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199204000-00010. Ann Plast Surg. 1992. PMID: 1596069
-
Histologic comparison of breast implant shells with smooth, foam, and pillar microstructuring in a rat model from 1 day to 6 months.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Feb;95(2):354-63. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199502000-00016. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995. PMID: 7824615
-
Histopathological reaction over prosthesis surface covered with silicone and polyurethane foam implanted in rats.Acta Cir Bras. 2012 Dec;27(12):866-73. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502012001200007. Acta Cir Bras. 2012. PMID: 23207753
-
Polyurethane foam-covered breast implants: a justified choice?Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(9):1600-6. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26004599 Review.
-
Current status of silicone breast implants.Bol Asoc Med P R. 1991 Aug;83(8):326-8. Bol Asoc Med P R. 1991. PMID: 1816782 Review.
Cited by
-
Fibroblast growth and polymorphonuclear granulocyte activation in the presence of a new biologically active sol-gel glass.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997 Jul;8(7):417-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1018553505001. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997. PMID: 15348724
-
Natural responses to unnatural materials: A molecular mechanism for foreign body reactions.Mol Med. 1999 Jun;5(6):351-8. Mol Med. 1999. PMID: 10415159 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Histamine release and fibrinogen adsorption mediate acute inflammatory responses to biomaterial implants in humans.J Transl Med. 2007 Jul 1;5:31. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-5-31. J Transl Med. 2007. PMID: 17603911 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mast cells mediate acute inflammatory responses to implanted biomaterials.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8841-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8841. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998. PMID: 9671766 Free PMC article.
-
The immunopathology of siliconosis. History, clinical presentation, and relation to silicosis and the chemistry of silicon and silicone.Immunol Res. 1998;18(3):125-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02788777. Immunol Res. 1998. PMID: 9951648 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources