Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;17(6):449-57.
doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0243. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic science

Affiliations
Review

Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic science

Céline Colnot. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

One of the goals of bone tissue engineering is to design delivery methods for skeletal stem/progenitor cells to repair or replace bone. Although the materials used to retain cells play a central role in the quality of the constructs, the source of cells is key for bone regeneration. Bone marrow is the most common cell source, but other tissues are now being explored, such as the periosteum, fat, muscle, cord blood, and embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells. The therapeutic effect of exogenous stem/progenitor cells is accepted, yet their contribution to bone repair is not well defined. The in vitro osteo- and/or chondrogenic potential of these skeletal progenitors do not necessarily predict their differentiation potential in vivo and their function may be affected by their ability to home correctly to bone. This review provides an overview of animal models used to test the efficacy of cell-based approaches. We examine the mechanisms of endogenous cell recruitment during bone repair and compare the role of local versus systemic cell recruitment. We discuss how the normal repair process can help define efficacious cell sources for bone tissue engineering and improve their methods of delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Einhorn T.A. Enhancement of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:940. - PubMed
    1. Dickson K. Katzman S. Delgado E. Contreras D. Delayed unions and nonunions of open tibial fractures. Correlation with arteriography results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302:189. - PubMed
    1. Kline A.J. Gruen G.S. Pape H.C. Tarkin I.S. Irrgang J.J. Wukich D.K. Early complications following the operative treatment of pilon fractures with and without diabetes. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:1042. - PubMed
    1. Griffin X.L. Warner F. Costa M. The role of electromagnetic stimulation in the management of established non-union of long bone fractures: what is the evidence? Injury. 2008;39:419. - PubMed
    1. Schofer M.D. Block J.E. Aigner J. Schmelz A. Improved healing response in delayed unions of the tibia with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:229. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources