Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Nov;28(11):1073-85.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9631-8. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

Sperm DNA integrity assays: diagnostic and prognostic challenges and implications in management of infertility

Monis Bilal Shamsi  1 , Syed Nazar Imam, Rima Dada
Affiliations
Review

Sperm DNA integrity assays: diagnostic and prognostic challenges and implications in management of infertility

Monis Bilal Shamsi et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Sperm is not a simple carrier of paternal genetic information but its role extends clearly beyond fertilization. Integrity of sperm genome is an essential pre-requisite for birth of healthy offspring and evaluation of sperm should entail DNA integrity analysis. DNA integrity analysis is a better diagnostic and prognostic marker of sperm reproductive potential. Conventional semen analysis emphasizes on sperm concentration, viability, motility and morphology and has been proven to be a poor indicator of reproductive potential and pregnancy outcome. To overcome the drawbacks associated with conventional semen analysis more useful fertility tests and molecular biomarkers have been explored. Among the different tests which have evolved for assessing the sperm reproductive potential, tests for sperm DNA quality are most promising. Sperm DNA damage has been closely associated with numerous indicators of reproductive health including fertilization, embryo quality, implantation, spontaneous abortion, congenital malformations and childhood diseases. It therefore has great potential as a prognostic test for both in vitro and in vivo conception. This review presents an updated account of tests that have better diagnostic and prognostic implications in the evaluation of sperm DNA damage. The basic principles, outline of methodology, advantage, disadvantage, clinical significance of each technique and implications of these tests have been discussed. The logistics of each test with respect to available resources and equipment in an andrology laboratory, the feasibility of performing these tests in routine diagnostic workup of infertile men and the opportunities and challenges provided by DNA testing in male fertility determination are also presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
DNA integrity by sperm chromatin dispersion test. Sperm 1 to 3: Large halo- unfragmented DNA. Sperm 4 and 5: Small halo- fragmented DNA
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comet image of sperm with fragmented and non fragmented DNA
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen–cervical mucus interaction. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
    1. WHO Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
    1. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, Coutifaris C, et al. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in infertile and fertile men. New Engl J Med. 2001;345:1388–1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guzick DS, Sullivan MW, Adamson GD, Cedars MI, Falk RJ, Peterson EP, et al. Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(2):207–213. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00177-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu DY, Baker HW. Evaluation and assessment of semen for IVF/ICSI. Asian J Androl. 2002;4(4):281–285. - PubMed