Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2011 Oct;8(10):1259-69.
doi: 10.1517/17425247.2011.615830. Epub 2011 Sep 12.

Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses

David Oyer et al. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: FlexTouch® (FT; Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) is a new prefilled insulin pen that has no push-button extension and low injection force. This multi-centre, crossover usability study evaluated the perceptions of, and preference for, FT versus another widely used prefilled pen, SoloStar® (SS; Sanofi, Paris, France), by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.

Research design and methods: Following instruction, participants performed injections into a foam cushion, randomly alternating between doses of 20, 40 and 80 international units (IU). Participants then answered questions on usability and preference.

Results: In all, 59 people with diabetes and 61 healthcare professionals (30 physicians and 31 nurses) took part. Overall, significantly more respondents preferred to use FT than SS (83 vs 10%, respectively), found FT easier to use (83 vs 9%) and would recommend FT to others (83 vs 8%; p < 0.001 for all). More respondents found it 'very/fairly easy' to reach the push-button and to inject 20, 40 and 80 IU with FT (93, 90 and 88% to inject, respectively) than with SS (73, 43 and 15% to inject, respectively; p < 0.001 for all). Most respondents chose FT as giving them the most confidence in correct and complete insulin delivery (76 vs 6%; p < 0.001) and considerably more were 'very/rather confident' in managing their daily insulin injections with FT than with SS (88 vs 58%).

Conclusions: Most participants rated FT as easier to use and to inject with, were more confident in its accuracy of insulin delivery and preferred it to SS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources