Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;29(2):235-42.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr069. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

Acceptability of screening to prevent osteoporotic fractures: a qualitative study with older women

Affiliations

Acceptability of screening to prevent osteoporotic fractures: a qualitative study with older women

Clare L Emmett et al. Fam Pract. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic fractures have a detrimental impact on health and quality of life, are more common in older women and are costly to treat. Screening to identify older women at high risk of fracture has the potential to offer substantial benefits. Understanding women's and professionals' experiences of screening will inform the implementation of screening in routine care.

Objective: To explore the views of older women and GPs about the acceptability of screening to prevent fractures.

Methods: A qualitative study conducted within a multi-centre randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening women aged 70-85 years for the prevention of fractures; 30 women randomized to the trial screening group and 15 GPs were recruited from general practices in North Somerset and Norfolk, UK. All 30 women and 11 of the GPs participated in face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Four GPs participated in a focus group. Data were analysed thematically, using the Framework Approach.

Results: Women and GPs viewed screening positively, recognizing its potential to improve fracture prevention and future health. Attending screening was not found to result in anxiety or excessive activity restriction. Demonstrating cost-effectiveness was key to the acceptability of screening amongst GPs. Implementing similar screening in routine care would require consideration of access to bone density scans, information provision to participants and mode of administration.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest an effective and cost-effective screening programme to reduce osteoporotic fractures could be implemented in routine care and would be well received by women and GPs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types