Influence of bladder neck suspension stitches on early continence after radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized study of 180 patients
- PMID: 21909121
- PMCID: PMC3752553
- DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.82
Influence of bladder neck suspension stitches on early continence after radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized study of 180 patients
Abstract
Several techniques have been introduced to improve early postoperative continence. In this study, we evaluated the impact of bladder neck (vesicourethral anastomosis) suspension on the outcome of extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy (EERPE). In this research, a total of 180 patients underwent EERPE. Group 1 included patients who underwent nerve-sparing EERPE (nsEERPE) (n=45), and Group 2 included patients who underwent nsEERPE with bladder neck suspension (BNS, n=45). Groups 3 (n=45) and 4 (n=45) included patients who received EERPE and EERPE with BNS, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive BNS with their nsEERPE or EERPE procedure. Perioperative parameters were recorded, and continence was evaluated by determining the number and weight of absorbent pads (pad weighing test) on the second day after catheter removal and by a questionnaire 3 months postoperatively. Two days after catheter removal, 11.1% of Group 1, 11.1% of Group 2, 4.4% of Group 3 and 8.9% of Group 4 were continent. The average urine loss was 80.4, 70.1, 325.0 and 291.3 g for the each of these groups, respectively. At 3 months, 76.5% of Group 1 and 81.3% of Group 2 were continent. The continence figures for Group 3 and 4 were 48.5% and 43.8%, respectively. Similar overall rates were observed in all groups. In conclusion, although there are controversial reports in the literature, early continence was never observed to be significantly higher in the BNS groups when compared with the non-BNS groups, regardless of the EERPE technique performed.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Effect of bladder neck sparing at robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on postoperative continence rates and biochemical recurrence.Urol Oncol. 2020 Jan;38(1):1.e11-1.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 2. Urol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31586543
-
Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Aug 20. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 20801579
-
Early continence in patients with localized prostate cancer. A comparison between open retropubic (RRPE) and endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE).Urol Oncol. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):798-803. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.10.013. Epub 2011 Jun 29. Urol Oncol. 2012. PMID: 21719324
-
[Simplified vesico-urethral anastomosis after radical retropubic prostatectomy for cancer. A preliminary comparative study].J Urol (Paris). 1995;101(3):113-21. J Urol (Paris). 1995. PMID: 8558028 Review. French.
-
Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and outcome.Asian J Androl. 2012 Mar;14(2):278-84. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.53. Epub 2011 Dec 19. Asian J Androl. 2012. PMID: 22179509 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Pelvic Anatomical Changes Caused by Radical Prostatectomy.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 21;14(13):3050. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133050. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35804823 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy.Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Jan 8;11:1756287218813787. doi: 10.1177/1756287218813787. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2019. PMID: 30671134 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pelvic Floor Reconstruction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques.Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 2;7(1):2737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02991-8. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28578433 Free PMC article.
-
A matched-analysis on short-term and long-term (up to 5 years of follow-up) urinary incontinence outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with and without anterior and posterior reconstruction: data on 1358 patients.Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jan;56(1):121-127. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03766-z. Epub 2023 Aug 30. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 37648873 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Minh D, Dietel A, Häfner T, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases. J Endourol. 2009;23:1467–72. - PubMed
-
- Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R, Do M, Sakelaropoulos G, et al. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy—effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive surgical margins. Eur Urol. 2006;49:103–12. - PubMed
-
- Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Schwalenberg T, Winkler M, et al. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;53:931–40. - PubMed
-
- Liatsikos E, Assimakopoulos K, Stolzenburg JU. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2008;80:226–30. - PubMed
-
- Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postoprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol. 2009;55:322–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical